fewer emergencies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fewer emergencies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a reduction in the number of emergencies or urgent situations, typically in a context related to safety, health, or crisis management. Example: "Implementing these safety measures has resulted in fewer emergencies at the workplace."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

"We've seen fewer emergencies in the last three years, but they have been more severe and conflict-related," he explained.

The Guardian

Cash for Work not only feeds people in an emergency, it can improve local agricultural conditions so that fewer emergencies happen.

The New York Times

The prime minister claimed that "with less need for acute admission, more people managing their own conditions in their own homes, fewer emergencies – we can save more than £2bn over the next three years all of which can be reinvested".

The Guardian

A great alternative is the Pocket First Aid & CPR app, $2 on iOS, which covers fewer emergencies but offers quick access to step-by-step instructions for more everyday situations, like an allergic reaction.

The New York Times - Tech

If we can get to grips with problems earlier, logic suggests that there'll be fewer emergencies to react to in the future.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

That means fewer emergency repairs and fewer unhappy passengers.

The Economist

As a result, they had fewer emergency room visits, fewer hospital admissions and lower health care costs.

The New York Times

Andriy Paruby, secretary of Ukraine's security and defence Council, told reporters: Last night there were already fewer emergency situations and fewer conflicts in Crimea.

The Guardian

But when the results were analyzed more closely, it turned out that the savings was not a result of fewer emergency room visits or hospital stays.

The New York Times

But those who reported less difficulty contacting a doctor after hours, say on nights and weekends, had fewer emergency room visits than people who experienced more difficulty.

The New York Times

This means families across these areas were committing less crime, experiencing less domestic violence, using fewer emergency health services, and needed less supervision and support from social workers.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "fewer emergencies", ensure the context clearly establishes what changes led to the reduction. Providing specific examples or data strengthens your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "less emergencies"; "emergencies" is a countable noun, so "fewer" is the correct quantifier. "Less" is for uncountable nouns like "less water" or "less time".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fewer emergencies" functions as a determiner phrase modifying a noun, indicating a reduced quantity of urgent events. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability, supporting its role in describing a decrease in critical situations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "fewer emergencies" is a grammatically sound and usable expression for indicating a reduction in the number of urgent or critical situations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for various contexts, primarily appearing in news and scientific domains. The analysis underscores the importance of using "fewer" with countable nouns like "emergencies", avoiding the common mistake of using "less". Alternatives such as "reduced emergencies" or "less frequent emergencies" can provide stylistic variation, but "fewer emergencies" remains a clear and effective choice. Remember to provide context and quantify when possible to enhance the impact of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reduced number of emergencies

Replaces "fewer" with a more descriptive phrase, slightly increasing formality.

decline in emergencies

Focuses on the downward trend of emergencies, rather than the quantity.

less frequent emergencies

Emphasizes the reduced occurrence of emergencies.

rarer emergencies

Highlights the infrequency of emergencies.

decrease in crisis situations

Substitutes "emergencies" with a broader term, "crisis situations".

lower incidence of emergencies

Uses more formal and technical language.

diminished emergency occurrences

Replaces both "fewer" and "emergencies" with more sophisticated vocabulary.

abatement of emergencies

A more formal and literary way to describe a decrease in emergencies.

reduced emergency incidents

Uses "incidents" as a synonym for "emergencies".

less common urgent situations

Rephrases the entire concept using simpler, more common vocabulary.

FAQs

How to use "fewer emergencies" in a sentence?

You can use "fewer emergencies" to describe a reduction in urgent or critical situations, such as "Implementing preventative measures resulted in "fewer emergencies" this year".

What can I say instead of "fewer emergencies"?

Alternatives to "fewer emergencies" include phrases like "reduced emergencies", "less frequent emergencies", or "a decline in emergencies" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "fewer emergencies" or "less emergencies"?

"Fewer emergencies" is correct. Use "fewer" with countable nouns (like emergencies) and "less" with uncountable nouns (like time or effort).

What's the difference between "fewer emergencies" and "reduced emergencies"?

While both indicate a decrease in emergencies, ""fewer emergencies"" focuses on the quantity, and "reduced emergencies" emphasizes the act of reduction. They are largely interchangeable but may fit slightly differently depending on sentence structure.