far from comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

"far from comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is not complete, thorough, or exhaustive. For example, "This list of job requirements is far from comprehensive."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

This list is far from comprehensive.

The New York Times

Obviously that list is far from comprehensive.

The Guardian

But as yet, it's far from comprehensive.

The New York Times

The book does include an index, but it is far from comprehensive.

The New Yorker

Some smaller companies deal in more esoteric fare, but their collections are far from comprehensive.

The New York Times - Arts

The WiMax coverage in Baltimore is good but far from comprehensive.

The New York Times - Tech

For now, such information is limited to about 15 categories and is far from comprehensive.

The New York Times - Tech

While the Bloomberg administration's report is far from comprehensive, those groups say, it is a notable improvement.

The New York Times

That list is far from comprehensive and does not begin to describe how thoroughly mediated this convention was.

The New York Times

The details included in the Pastebin message, including how the attack was carried out, are far from comprehensive.

Independent

The numbers are far from comprehensive, and are generally snapshots from a single country in a single year.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "far from comprehensive" when you want to politely acknowledge that a resource, list, or piece of information isn't exhaustive. It sets realistic expectations without diminishing the value of what is being presented.

Common error

Avoid using "far from comprehensive" when you intend to convey that something is completely useless or irrelevant. The phrase is meant to indicate a lack of completeness, not a total absence of value.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "far from comprehensive" functions as an adjective phrase. According to Ludwig AI, it's used to modify a noun or pronoun, indicating that something lacks completeness or thoroughness. It's often used to set expectations or acknowledge limitations, as seen in many examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

52%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "far from comprehensive" is a grammatically correct and commonly used adjective phrase that means "not complete or thorough". Ludwig AI confirms its usability in a variety of contexts. It's frequently found in news, media, and scientific publications, typically used to temper claims and set realistic expectations. When using the phrase, ensure that you're accurately portraying the scope of the subject, and consider alternative phrases like "not at all exhaustive" or "nowhere near complete" for nuanced meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

far from exhaustive

Similar to the original query, but replaces "comprehensive" with the synonym "exhaustive".

not at all exhaustive

Emphasizes the lack of thoroughness, differing slightly in formality.

nowhere near complete

Highlights the significant degree of incompleteness.

lacking thoroughness

Focuses specifically on the absence of a detailed or careful approach.

by no means all-inclusive

Stresses that the subject does not include everything.

not even close to exhaustive

Similar to "not at all exhaustive" but potentially more emphatic.

hardly all-encompassing

Emphasizes the limited scope or coverage.

incomplete to a significant degree

Highlights the substantial level of incompleteness.

merely a glimpse

Implies a very superficial or incomplete view.

only scratching the surface

Suggests an even more superficial level of examination or coverage.

FAQs

How can I use "far from comprehensive" in a sentence?

You can use "far from comprehensive" to describe something that isn't complete or exhaustive. For example, "This guide is "far from comprehensive", but it covers the basics."

What is a good alternative to "far from comprehensive"?

Some alternatives to "far from comprehensive" include "not at all exhaustive", "nowhere near complete", or "lacking thoroughness". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "far from comprehensive" in formal writing?

Yes, "far from comprehensive" is suitable for formal writing. It's a clear and professional way to acknowledge limitations without being overly negative.

What does it mean when someone says a list is "far from comprehensive"?

It means the list isn't complete and there are likely many more items that could be included. It's an acknowledgement that the list is not exhaustive.