false evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"false evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to facts that are not true or reliable, typically used in a legal context. For example, "The defendant's attorney argued that the police had presented false evidence to the court in an attempt to prove his client's guilt."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Fear is false evidence appearing real.

The New York Times - Sports

Yes, it's illegal to give false evidence.

The Guardian - Opinion

Mr Clarke has denied giving false evidence.

The Guardian

Details of his false evidence were revealed on Wednesday.

The Guardian

State witnesses gave false evidence to the court, Roux alleged.

The Guardian

I have no idea why they would give false evidence against myself".

The Guardian

Investigators say the revelations of false evidence have tainted hundreds of convictions.

The New York Times

Creating false evidence, putting it in, is possibly worse than anything I could do in Jersey".

The Guardian

"This was the intentional destruction of evidence and the intentional manufacture of false evidence.

The Guardian - Arts

"Perjury is the wilful giving of false evidence under oath or affirmation in judicial proceedings.

The Guardian

Among his other creations were Lucky 13, Leave Your Name and Number, and False Evidence.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or investigative contexts, use "false evidence" to clearly indicate that the evidence presented is not genuine and could potentially mislead the proceedings.

Common error

Avoid using "false evidence" when you simply mean that there is no evidence available. "False evidence" implies that some form of proof was presented, but it was later discovered to be untrue, whereas a "lack of evidence" indicates that no proof exists in the first place.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "false evidence" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the object of a verb or the complement of a preposition. It denotes information or materials presented as proof that are, in reality, untrue or fabricated. Ludwig AI confirms its wide usage across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "false evidence" is a commonly used noun phrase that denotes inaccurate or fabricated information presented as proof. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, academic, and legal settings. While alternatives like "fraudulent evidence" or "fabricated evidence" may offer nuanced meanings, "false evidence" remains a straightforward and widely understood term for describing misleading or untrue proof. Understanding its usage helps in navigating legal and investigative contexts where the authenticity of evidence is crucial.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fraudulent evidence

Emphasizes the deceitful nature of the evidence.

fake evidence

Implies the evidence is a deliberate fabrication.

fabricated evidence

Implies a stronger degree of falsification, suggesting the evidence was invented.

phony evidence

Suggests the evidence is not genuine or authentic.

erroneous evidence

Highlights that the evidence contains mistakes or inaccuracies.

untrue evidence

Simply states the evidence is not true.

incorrect evidence

Focuses on the inaccuracy of the evidence.

spurious evidence

Indicates the evidence lacks validity or authenticity.

contrived evidence

Suggests the evidence was artificially created or manipulated.

false testimony

Specifically refers to untrue statements given under oath.

FAQs

How to use "false evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "false evidence" to describe situations where information presented as proof is incorrect or fabricated. For example, "The prosecution's case relied heavily on what turned out to be "false evidence"."

What can I say instead of "false evidence"?

You can use alternatives like "fraudulent evidence", "fabricated evidence", or "phony evidence" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "false evidence" or "untrue evidence"?

Both "false evidence" and "untrue evidence" are grammatically correct, but "false evidence" is more commonly used, especially in legal and formal contexts. "False" often implies a deliberate attempt to deceive, while "untrue" simply indicates a lack of truth.

What's the difference between "false evidence" and "circumstantial evidence"?

"False evidence" is proof that is factually incorrect or fabricated. "Circumstantial evidence", on the other hand, is indirect evidence that implies something but doesn't prove it directly. It may be true but require an inference to connect it to a conclusion.