extradited to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "extradited to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to refer to the process of sending a person accused or convicted of a crime from one jurisdiction to another for trial or punishment. Example: "The suspect was extradited to the United States to face charges related to fraud."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Now he is being extradited to Massachusetts.

The New York Times

He was extradited to France in July.

The New York Times

He agreed to be extradited to California.

The New York Times

Instead, he was extradited to Peru.

The New York Times

Both could eventually be extradited to Spain.

The New York Times

He was extradited to the United States in November 2010.

The New York Times

He could then be extradited to Sweden for questioning.

Independent

He was extradited to the US in 2007.

The Guardian

Most likely he will be extradited to the United States.

The Economist

If extradited to Tajikistan, he could face the death penalty.

The New York Times

He was extradited to the US in 2013.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "extradited to", ensure that you clearly state both the origin and destination jurisdictions involved in the extradition process.

Common error

Avoid using "extradited to" when simply referring to someone traveling or being sent to another location without a legal extradition process. Extradition specifically implies a formal legal procedure.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "extradited to" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of extraditing someone, followed by a preposition indicating the destination country or jurisdiction. Ludwig examples confirm this usage in legal and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "extradited to" is a commonly used phrase that specifically refers to the legal process of transferring an individual from one jurisdiction to another for trial or punishment. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and most frequently found in news and media sources. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure the context involves a formal extradition process and to specify both the origin and destination jurisdictions. While alternatives like "sent to" or "transferred to" exist, they lack the specific legal implication of "extradited to".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deported to

Refers specifically to the expulsion of a non-citizen from a country back to their country of origin.

remanded to

In a legal context, refers to sending a case back to a lower court or sending a person back into custody.

turned over to

Implies handing someone over to another authority or entity.

transferred to

A general term indicating a movement from one place to another, often within a system or organization.

surrendered to

Implies giving oneself up to an authority or enemy.

sent to

A broad term denoting the act of causing someone or something to go to a particular destination.

consigned to

Suggests handing someone over to a negative fate or situation.

shipped to

Often used for goods or cargo but can be used figuratively for people being sent somewhere, often against their will.

relocated to

Indicates a change of residence or business location.

dispatched to

Suggests sending someone quickly and efficiently to a specific location.

FAQs

How is "extradited to" used in a sentence?

Use "extradited to" when referring to the legal process of transferring someone accused or convicted of a crime from one jurisdiction to another. For example, "The suspect was "extradited to" the United States to face fraud charges".

What's the difference between "deported to" and ""extradited to""?

"Deported to" refers to sending a non-citizen back to their country of origin, while ""extradited to"" is the legal process of transferring someone accused or convicted of a crime to another jurisdiction for trial or punishment.

What can I say instead of ""extradited to""?

Depending on the context, you might use alternatives like "sent to", "transferred to", or "turned over to", though these lack the specific legal implication of extradition.

Is it correct to say "He was extradited from" instead of "He was "extradited to""?

While "extradited from" can be used to describe the place of origin, ""extradited to"" specifies the destination. The correct usage depends on whether you want to emphasize where the person came from or where they are going. For example: He was extradited from Spain to the US.