explicitly forbade

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "explicitly forbade" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that something was clearly and firmly prohibited. Example: "The school explicitly forbade students from using their phones during class."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

Legislation neither explicitly forbade it (except in so far as it forbade murder) nor enshrined it as a right.

The Economist

In Washington, the State Department said that agreement explicitly forbade missile tests or satellite launchings, among other military actions.

The New York Times

A20 Bush Bans Paying Columnists With his administration under fire for questionable publicity practices, President Bush explicitly forbade his Cabinet to pay commentators to promote his policies.

The New York Times

The Indian Penal Code of 1860 carried two sections (153 and 295) that explicitly forbade “vilification” of groups, and the “insult of the religion of a class of people”.

University of California, Berkeley

Eventually, I decided to force the issue and called a meeting at which explicitly forbade them from lying to our customers on the grounds that the lies would inevitably backfire and do more harm than good.

Harvard Business Review

Officials have been at pains to stress that the nationality and country of birth data would not be shared with the Home Office, insisting that an interdepartmental agreement explicitly forbade it.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Same-sex marriage is explicitly forbidden in 38 states.

The New York Times - Books

Others had clearly collaborated, which their professor had explicitly forbidden.

The New York Times - Health

Animal abuse is explicitly forbidden in the Bible.

The Guardian

It should be explicitly forbidden to do so.

The Guardian - Opinion

Parents and others were explicitly forbidden from doing so.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "explicitly forbade", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what entity is doing the forbidding and to whom or what the prohibition applies. Clarity is key to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "explicitly forbade" without clearly defining the boundaries of what is prohibited. A vague prohibition can lead to unintended violations and misunderstandings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "explicitly forbade" functions as a verb phrase indicating a clear and direct prohibition. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use in various contexts, from legal agreements to personal directives, emphasizing the unambiguous nature of the ban.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

21%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Science

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "explicitly forbade" serves to convey a clear and direct prohibition, leaving no room for ambiguity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in written English. The phrase finds common usage in news media and academic settings, reflecting its utility in formal communication. When using "explicitly forbade", it is important to define the scope of the prohibition and avoid vagueness. Alternatives such as "expressly prohibited" or "strictly banned" can be used to achieve a similar effect, although with subtle differences in tone and emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

specifically forbade

Similar to "explicitly forbade", but emphasizes the precision of the prohibition.

expressly prohibited

Replaces "forbade" with "prohibited", which is a direct synonym, maintaining the formal tone.

strictly banned

Uses "banned" instead of "forbade", emphasizing the prohibition, and "strictly" to highlight its enforcement.

categorically disallowed

Replaces "explicitly" and "forbade" with stronger terms, indicating a complete and unambiguous denial.

absolutely prohibited

Similar to "expressly prohibited", but with a stronger emphasis on the lack of exceptions.

outright prohibited

Highlights the direct and complete nature of the ban, using "outright" for emphasis.

expressly disavowed

Suggests a formal rejection or denial, which is close in meaning to forbidding something.

made it strictly off-limits

An idiomatic expression that conveys the idea of a firm and enforced prohibition.

placed a strict embargo on

Uses the term "embargo" to suggest a strong prohibition, particularly in a business or political context.

laid down a firm interdiction against

Uses more formal and legalistic language to convey a strong prohibition.

FAQs

How can I use "explicitly forbade" in a sentence?

Use "explicitly forbade" to indicate a clear and direct prohibition. For example: "The contract "explicitly forbade" the use of subcontractors without prior approval."

What are some alternatives to "explicitly forbade"?

You can use alternatives like "expressly prohibited", "strictly banned", or "categorically disallowed" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it redundant to use "explicitly" with "forbade"?

While "forbade" implies prohibition, "explicitly forbade" emphasizes the clarity and directness of the prohibition, leaving no room for misinterpretation. The redundancy serves to strengthen the meaning.

What is the difference between "explicitly forbade" and "implicitly forbade"?

"Explicitly forbade" means something was directly and clearly prohibited, while "implicitly forbade" means the prohibition was suggested or understood without being directly stated. For instance, a rule might "explicitly forbid" running in the halls, but "implicitly forbid" loud talking.