Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

experimentally confirmed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"experimentally confirmed" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been affirmed through experimentation or scientific testing. For example, "This theory was experimentally confirmed in a study conducted in 2015."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The literature search end up in a total of 130 translocation components in yeast and A. thaliana, which are either experimentally confirmed or homologous to experimentally confirmed factors.

(This has never been experimentally confirmed).

News & Media

The New Yorker

Like all such unifying ideas, it is so beautiful that it almost has to be true, even though it has still not been experimentally confirmed.

News & Media

The Guardian

He adds that the notion of core rhythm has not been experimentally confirmed.

News & Media

The New York Times

This is experimentally confirmed.

This maximum was experimentally confirmed.

These maxima were experimentally confirmed.

This is experimentally confirmed in [2, 8].

Predicted levels of remediation were experimentally confirmed.

This assumption was experimentally confirmed using the abovementioned images.

The numerical heat model was experimentally confirmed.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, specify the parameters or conditions under which something was "experimentally confirmed". This helps avoid ambiguity and provides a more precise understanding of the results.

Common error

Avoid using "experimentally confirmed" when the evidence is preliminary or based on a limited number of experiments. Overstating the certainty can mislead readers and undermine the credibility of your statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

Adjectival Phrase: "Experimentally confirmed" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate that something has been verified through experimental methods. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. For example, "the "experimentally confirmed" theory".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "experimentally confirmed" is a frequently used adjectival phrase, mainly employed in scientific and formal contexts to indicate that a theory, hypothesis, or finding has been validated through rigorous testing. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. Alternatives such as ""experimentally verified"" or ""validated empirically"" can be used to add variety to writing. When using "experimentally confirmed", it's important to specify the experiment or study that supports the confirmation, avoiding overstatement of certainty with preliminary evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "experimentally confirmed" in a sentence?

Use "experimentally confirmed" to indicate that a hypothesis, theory, or prediction has been supported by the results of an experiment. For example, "The efficacy of the drug was "experimentally confirmed" in a double-blind study".

What are some alternatives to "experimentally confirmed"?

Alternatives include "experimentally verified", "validated empirically", and "substantiated by experiment". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "experimentally confirmed" in non-scientific contexts?

While "experimentally confirmed" is most common in scientific writing, it can be used in other contexts to emphasize that something has been proven through a rigorous, testable process. However, ensure that the context aligns with the level of rigor implied by the phrase.

What's the difference between "experimentally confirmed" and "theoretically supported"?

"Experimentally confirmed" means that empirical evidence from experiments supports a claim, while "theoretically supported" means that the claim aligns with existing theories or models. They represent different types of evidence, with experimental confirmation often considered stronger.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: