experienced with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "experienced with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you are describing someone's familiarity or skill with a particular subject or task. For example, you could say, "He is an experienced web designer with over ten years of experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

We're very experienced with them.

The New York Times - Arts

Music is not experienced with just one sense.

The New York Times

That's an idea many experienced with ayahuasca vehemently dismiss.

The Guardian - Travel

I consider myself very experienced with aquatic life.

The New York Times - Magazine

"What I have experienced with England has been fantastic.

Independent

For me, it gets its meaning from what I've experienced with it.

The Guardian - Music

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

"Experience with men.

The New Yorker

"Operational experience with partner investigative agencies".

Independent

His experience with United States carriers?

The New York Times - Travel

Experience with novel: one paragraph.

The New York Times

They had experience with this, after all.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When highlighting expertise, follow "experienced with" with specific skills or areas of knowledge to provide context. For example: "experienced with data analysis", "experienced with project management".

Common error

Avoid vagueness by specifying the type and extent of experience. Saying "experienced with technology" is less effective than "experienced with cloud computing and cybersecurity protocols".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "experienced with" functions as an adjectival phrase describing a noun. It indicates that someone possesses a certain level of skill, knowledge, or familiarity with a particular subject or activity. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "experienced with" is a grammatically sound and very common expression used to denote proficiency or familiarity in a specific area. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely accepted in written English. Its adjectival function serves to highlight someone's competence, and its usage spans across neutral to professional registers. When using "experienced with", it's best practice to specify the area of expertise to avoid vagueness. Some alternatives include "proficient in" and "skilled at". Based on the examples provided by Ludwig, "experienced with" finds frequent use in news, science and wiki contexts, reflecting its broad applicability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

familiar with

Indicates acquaintance or awareness.

proficient in

Focuses on skill level rather than past exposure.

skilled at

Emphasizes developed ability.

knowledgeable about

Highlights informational awareness.

competent in

Focuses on ability to perform effectively.

well-versed in

Suggests comprehensive understanding and experience.

seasoned in

Suggests a lot of practical experience.

acquainted with

Implies a casual or introductory level of knowledge.

had exposure to

Focuses on having been exposed to something, not necessarily skilled.

trained in

Highlights formal instruction or training.

FAQs

How can I use "experienced with" in a sentence?

Use "experienced with" to describe someone's proficiency or familiarity with a particular subject or skill. For example, "She is "experienced with" project management software".

What are some alternatives to "experienced with"?

You can use alternatives such as "proficient in", "skilled at", or "familiar with" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct: "experienced with" or "experienced in"?

Both "experienced with" and "experienced in" are acceptable, but "experienced with" is often used to denote familiarity or skill in using a tool or process. For example, "experienced with database management". "Experienced in" is more frequently used when the focus is on a broader domain, such as "experienced in marketing".

What's the difference between "experienced with" and "familiar with"?

"Experienced with" suggests a level of hands-on involvement and skill, while "familiar with" implies knowledge or awareness without necessarily having extensive practical application.