expected to know

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "expected to know" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone should have knowledge or awareness of something based on their role, experience, or context. Example: "As a team leader, you are expected to know the project deadlines and deliverables."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We're expected to know who we are.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

You'll be expected to know basic linear algebra and calculus.

Stanford University

I expected to know Kim Williams 30 years from now.

The New Yorker

Each student is expected to know certain things.

The Guardian

You can't be expected to know everything, I said.

The Guardian - Books

Even specialists cannot be expected to know and remember everything.

The New York Times

As an intern you aren't expected to know everything.

The Guardian

All those things I was expected to know.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

All 100,000 employees are expected to know the credo.

The New York Times

You were expected to know all their references.

The New York Times - Magazine

Common knowledge is information that a reader can reasonably be expected to know.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "expected to know", clearly define the context in which the expectation exists to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify whether the expectation is based on professional standards, educational requirements, or common sense.

Common error

Avoid using "expected to know" in situations where the knowledge requirement is unrealistic or unfair. Ensure the audience or individual in question has had the opportunity and resources to acquire the knowledge.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "expected to know" functions as a verb phrase indicating an obligation or anticipation of possessing certain information or skills. Ludwig examples confirm this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "expected to know" is a versatile verb phrase used to indicate that someone should possess certain knowledge, whether due to their role, education, or general understanding. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used in diverse contexts ranging from news articles to academic papers. While "expected to know" is widely accepted, it's essential to define the context clearly to avoid unrealistic expectations. Alternatives such as "supposed to know" or "required to know" can offer subtle differences in meaning, depending on the situation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

supposed to know

Indicates a generally held belief or expectation, often implying a social norm.

required to know

Emphasizes a formal or mandatory need for knowledge.

assumed to know

Suggests a presumption that someone possesses certain knowledge, whether justified or not.

presumed to know

Similar to 'assumed to know', but often used in legal or formal contexts.

ought to know

Implies a moral or logical obligation to possess certain knowledge.

should know

Suggests a recommendation or expectation based on reason or experience.

meant to know

Indicates that knowledge was intended or planned to be imparted.

obligated to know

Highlights a formal or legal duty to possess knowledge.

tasked with knowing

Indicates knowledge is part of the responsibilities related to a task.

counted on to know

Highlights an element of trust and dependence.

FAQs

How can I use "expected to know" in a sentence?

Use "expected to know" to indicate that someone should possess certain knowledge, often based on their role or experience. For example, "As a software engineer, you are "expected to know" basic coding principles".

What are some alternatives to "expected to know"?

You can use alternatives such as "supposed to know", "required to know", or "assumed to know" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "expected to know"?

It's appropriate when referring to knowledge that is reasonably within someone's scope of expertise or training. Avoid using it when the knowledge is highly specialized or obscure.

What's the difference between "expected to know" and "hoped to know"?

"Expected to know" implies a reasonable anticipation of knowledge, whereas "hoped to know" suggests a desire or aspiration for knowledge that may not be realistic or required.