Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
existed at
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "existed at" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the location or time where something was present or occurred. Example: "The ancient civilization existed at the site of what is now modern-day Egypt."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Provided that she existed at all.
News & Media
Communist rulers denied Ruthenes existed at all.
News & Media
Neither existed at the time.
News & Media
A similar gap existed at smaller organizations.
News & Media
What other animals existed at this time?
News & Media
He was, if he existed at all, unique.
News & Media
The fact is Migron shouldn't have existed at all.
News & Media
Or before anyone was sure that she existed at all.
News & Media
Some Pakistani officers denied a problem existed at all.
News & Media
Sometimes I question whether he existed at all.
News & Media
(You start by marvelling that it existed at all.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "existed at", ensure that the context clearly establishes both the time and location being referenced for clarity and precision.
Common error
Avoid embedding "existed at" within overly complex sentences, as this can make the sentence difficult to parse. Break down complex sentences to ensure readability and clarity.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "existed at" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase indicating the location or time at which something was present or occurred. Ludwig shows examples in diverse contexts, supporting its broad applicability.
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
43%
Wiki
7%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "existed at" is a grammatically correct and commonly used prepositional phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, noting its frequent appearance in scientific and news media contexts. It serves to specify the location or time at which something was present. While versatile, maintaining clarity in sentence structure is advised, as excessive complexity may hinder comprehension. Alternatives such as "was located at" or "occurred at" may offer nuanced precision depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was present at
Replaces "existed" with "was present", emphasizing presence rather than existence.
was located at
Highlights the physical location or placement.
was situated at
Similar to "was located at", but emphasizes the position or setting.
occurred at
Focuses on the happening or taking place at a specific location or time.
was found at
Emphasizes discovery or finding something in a particular place.
was established at
Highlights the founding or setting up of something at a certain location.
prevailed at
Suggests a widespread presence or influence at a certain time or place.
was in place at
Suggests something was ready or functional at a specific location or time.
was available at
Indicates that something could be obtained or accessed at a particular location.
held sway at
Implies influence or control at a specific place or time.
FAQs
How can I use "existed at" in a sentence?
Use "existed at" to indicate the location or time period where something was present. For example, "A store formerly "existed at" 20 East 60th Street" or "A functional benefit "existed at" 1-year follow-up".
What are some alternatives to "existed at"?
You can use phrases like "was located at", "was present at", or "occurred at" as alternatives to "existed at", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "was existed at" instead of "existed at"?
No, "was existed at" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""existed at"", which is the past tense of "exist" combined with the preposition "at".
What's the difference between "existed in" and "existed at"?
"Existed in" typically refers to a broader context, like a time period or environment, while "existed at" refers to a specific location or point in time. For example, "Dinosaurs existed in the Mesozoic Era" versus "A settlement existed at this location in 1000 AD".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested