Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

excluded for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded for" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been excluded from a group or set for a specific purpose or reason. For example, "The applicant was excluded for failing to meet the minimum qualification requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Construction contracts have been excluded for this analysis.

News & Media

The Guardian

Even then, two candidates were excluded "for reasons of conduct".

Why, then, did Einstein's question get excluded for so long from reputable theoretical physics?

News & Media

The New Yorker

South Africa are excluded for their policy of apartheid, in a games overshadowed by politics.

"Sometimes he would be fully excluded for something that seemed incredibly minor.

News & Media

The Guardian

Much of the trial was held behind closed doors, with media excluded for many months.

News & Media

The Guardian

Sometimes the blame is shifted onto the excluded for being paranoid or not proactive enough.

If prostate cancer rates fall is that because V.A. patients were excluded, for example?

He said he had been excluded for drug possession, but had since turned his life around.

News & Media

The New York Times

Women were excluded for the same reason.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Of these, 46 were excluded for duplicity.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "excluded for", ensure the reason for exclusion is clear and specific to avoid ambiguity. State the criteria that led to the exclusion directly after the phrase to maintain clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "excluded for" without a clear explanation. Vague reasons like "excluded for various reasons" leave the reader uninformed and can undermine the credibility of your statement. Always specify the reason for exclusion.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded for" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating the reason or basis for something being omitted or not included. It typically modifies a verb or noun, providing context for the exclusion. Ludwig's analysis confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "excluded for" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to clearly state the reasons for omitting something. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used across various contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and formal writing. To use it effectively, ensure the reason for exclusion is explicit to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. Related phrases like "omitted due to" or "disregarded because of" can provide similar meanings, but "excluded for" often offers a more concise option. Its prevalence in authoritative sources underscores its reliability and appropriateness in formal communication.

FAQs

How do I use "excluded for" in a sentence?

Use "excluded for" to indicate that something was not included due to a specific reason. For example, "The data was "excluded for" incompleteness."

What are some alternatives to "excluded for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "omitted due to", "disregarded because of", or "left out on account of", each carrying slightly different nuances.

Is it better to say "excluded for" or "excluded because of"?

"Excluded for" and "excluded because of" are often interchangeable, but "excluded for" is more concise. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis on causality.

What does "excluded for" imply in a research context?

In research, "excluded for" indicates that certain data or participants were removed from a study due to specific criteria, such as incomplete data, protocol violations, or other factors that could compromise the integrity of the results.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: