excluded by

USAGE SUMMARY

"excluded by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been removed from a group, set, or situation. For example: "The new regulations excluded by those aged under 18 from entering the building."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Women also found themselves excluded by this insider game.

The Guardian

Hugely damning evidence against Black was excluded by the judge.

The Guardian - Opinion

However, are they really excluded, by their background, from the parts that are available?

The Guardian - Opinion

Yet, eventually she was wounded and excluded by those Spanish-speaking compatriots.

The New York Times - Books

2. Language Words are powerful, and feeling excluded by language can have a lasting cultural impact.

The Guardian

But excluded by her brothers' symbiotic relationship, Cotillard didn't talk much: "I couldn't identify with anyone.

The Guardian - Film

When I stopped playing basketball, I found myself excluded by others.

The New York Times - Magazine

Aghast, Kinbote sets about reinstating all the precious material excluded by Shade.

The New Yorker

Not all journalists have felt excluded by the Bush White House.

The New Yorker

"So book jacket portraits are not excluded by nature just because they have a commercial purpose".

The New York Times - Books

They had felt excluded by the Protestant state and considered themselves Irish first and foremost.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "excluded by", ensure that the subject performing the exclusion is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "excluded by" when an active voice construction is more appropriate and direct. For example, instead of "The data was excluded by the researcher", use "The researcher excluded the data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has been removed or prevented by a specific agent or condition. Ludwig shows its correct usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "excluded by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. As Ludwig AI shows, the phrase is commonly employed across scientific, news, and formal business contexts to emphasize the cause or agent of exclusion. When using "excluded by", ensure clarity about the agent performing the exclusion and avoid its use where an active voice would be more direct. Alternatives such as "barred by" or "prevented by" can be used depending on the specific nuance needed. With a strong presence in authoritative sources, "excluded by" remains a reliable choice for formal and neutral communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

barred by

This alternative suggests a more forceful or legal prevention.

prevented by

This alternative focuses on the action of stopping something from happening.

omitted by

This alternative implies a deliberate act of leaving something out.

rejected by

This alternative indicates a refusal to accept something or someone.

left out by

This alternative is more informal and suggests being unintentionally excluded.

disallowed by

This alternative suggests that something is not permitted based on rules or regulations.

disqualified by

This alternative focuses on the act of making someone ineligible.

bypassed by

This alternative indicates that something was ignored.

overlooked by

This alternative focuses on an unintentional failure to notice.

not included by

This alternative is a straightforward way of stating that something is not part of a group.

FAQs

How do I use "excluded by" in a sentence?

Use "excluded by" when you want to emphasize that something or someone was prevented or left out by a specific agent. For example, "The previous years are "excluded by the statute of limitations"".

What are some alternatives to "excluded by"?

You can use phrases such as "barred by", "prevented by", or "omitted by" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "excluded by" or "excluding"?

The choice depends on whether you want to use a passive or active voice. "Excluded by" emphasizes the agent doing the exclusion (passive), while "excluding" focuses on the act of exclusion itself (active). For instance, "Dead cells were "excluded by PI staining"" (passive) versus "Excluding dead cells, we analyzed the remaining data" (active).

What's the difference between "excluded by" and "except for"?

"Excluded by" signifies a deliberate act of removing something based on a specific criterion. "Except for", on the other hand, indicates an exception to a general statement. For example, "All participants were included, "except for those with pre-existing conditions"" versus "Participants with pre-existing conditions were "excluded by the study criteria"".