excluded as good

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "excluded as good" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts where something is deemed not suitable or acceptable, but the phrasing is awkward. Example: "The proposal was excluded as good due to its lack of feasibility."

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In contrast, expression patterns of several translation initiation factors were shown to be unstable in wheat [ 55], and have been excluded as good candidate reference genes in poplar [ 38] and Darnel ryegrass [ 54].

BMC Plant Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In addition, patients with severe retinopathy were excluded as some examinations demanded good eyesight.

BMC Gastroenterology

Eight were excluded as duplication.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

As with the best horror, it's as effective for what it excludes as what it includes, and this scene is a good example: it's gorier in the mind than it is on the screen.

The New Yorker

Boundary changes may exclude as many as 2,000 Tory voters.

The Guardian

Clinical periodontal conditions and OHI-S, as well as sex, were excluded from the final model, as good model-data fit was not obtained when these conditions were included.

BMC Oral Health

I don't know anyone who's as good at excluding splogs as Ask/Bloglines – they only display blog search results from blogs that at least one Bloglines user has subscribed to and they have algorithms to prevent gaming of that safeguard as well.

TechCrunch

It includes the infertile as well as same sex marriages, and it is as good at excluding multiple spouses and marriages to siblings and pets as is Professor George's definition.

Huffington Post

A model including PSA and methylation of DPYS, HSPB1, MAL and TIG1, but excluding Gleason score, was almost as good at predicting prostate cancer related mortality as the full model including Gleason score.

Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics

The exponents characterizing these scaling laws confirmed that the PEO chain in methanol has a flexible conformation with relatively large excluded volume, but methanol is not as good solvent as water.

Polymer

Before thinning, the variation in sapflow for spruce was best explained by CI when trees close to a strip-road were excluded; for pine, needle mass was equally as good as CI.

Forest Ecology and Management

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "excluded as good", ensure the context clearly indicates the criteria for exclusion. This phrasing is unusual, so clarity is paramount.

Common error

Avoid using "excluded as good" when the reason for exclusion isn't related to inherent qualities but external factors. Prefer more direct phrasings like "rejected due to budget constraints" to avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "excluded as good" functions as a descriptive phrase, indicating a situation where something is dismissed despite possessing positive attributes. Ludwig shows limited examples, indicating uncommon usage. It often implies a comparison where other options are deemed superior.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

38%

News & Media

38%

Wiki

24%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "excluded as good" is a grammatically sound but infrequent phrase used to describe a situation where something is rejected despite possessing positive qualities. Ludwig's analysis reveals that its rarity contributes to the potential for misinterpretation, emphasizing the need for clear contextualization. The phrase is best suited for neutral to slightly formal registers and finds its primary contexts in scientific, news, and general discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rejected as suitable

Replaces "excluded" with "rejected" and "good" with "suitable", implying a similar act of dismissal based on adequacy.

disregarded as acceptable

Uses "disregarded" instead of "excluded" and "acceptable" instead of "good", suggesting a decision to ignore something deemed satisfactory.

eliminated as viable

Substitutes "eliminated" for "excluded" and "viable" for "good", conveying a removal due to lack of feasibility.

dismissed as satisfactory

Replaces "excluded" with "dismissed" and "good" with "satisfactory", indicating a rejection despite meeting basic requirements.

discounted as adequate

Uses "discounted" instead of "excluded" and "adequate" instead of "good", suggesting a downplaying of something that is just sufficient.

ruled out as valid

Substitutes "ruled out" for "excluded" and "valid" for "good", implying a decision against something considered legitimate.

not considered optimal

Avoids "excluded" entirely, focusing on the lack of optimality instead of exclusion.

deemed insufficient

Replaces the entire phrase with a direct statement of insufficiency.

judged as inadequate

Uses "judged" in place of "excluded" and "inadequate" instead of "good", pointing to a formal assessment of deficiency.

regarded as substandard

Replaces the phrase with a description of something being below the expected level of quality.

FAQs

How can I use "excluded as good" in a sentence?

The phrase "excluded as good" can be used when something is being rejected despite possessing positive qualities, often because it doesn't meet specific requirements or a better alternative exists. For example, "The candidate was "excluded as good" because another candidate had more relevant experience".

What's a more common alternative to "excluded as good"?

More common alternatives include phrases like "rejected as suitable", "disregarded as acceptable", or "deemed insufficient" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "excluded as good" grammatically correct?

Yes, "excluded as good" is grammatically correct, but it's not a very common or natural-sounding phrase. It's understandable but might sound awkward to some speakers.

What's the difference between "excluded as good" and "rejected as bad"?

"Excluded as good" implies something was rejected despite having positive qualities, while "rejected as bad" means something was rejected because it was considered to be of poor quality or unsuitable.