exclude where relevant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "exclude where relevant" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that certain information or items should not be included in a discussion or analysis if they do not apply to the situation at hand. Example: "In this report, we will focus on the main findings and exclude where relevant any data that does not pertain to our specific research question."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Pregnancy was excluded where appropriate.

Diabetes Care

HER2 IHC 2+ cases in which no FISH data were available were excluded from analysis where relevant (n = 4).

Breast Cancer Research

Owing to the very low level of missing data, records with missing information were excluded from the analysis where relevant.

BMJ Open

Where relevant, analyses excluding arable fields were repeated.

BMC Ecology

Relevant cultural, healthcare structure or cost differences were documented and, where relevant, were excluded or amended from country specific CRFs/Diaries.

BMC Family Practice

Questions about documentation of effect and benefit of CAM were the most frequent, and also the category with the highest proportion of answers where relevant information was found (excluding questions about contraindications).

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Where relevant, we investigated the effect of excluding outlying data points and were unable to identify any important differences (data not shown).

British Medical Journal

Where relevant information was not available, the SNP was excluded from analysis.

Biological Psychiatry

Systematic reviews: where relevant literature has been identified by means of structured search of bibliographic and other databases; where transparent methodological criteria are used to exclude papers that do not meet an explicit methodological benchmark, and which presents rigorous conclusions about outcomes.

BMJ Open

Papers will be included if they are: Systematic reviews: where relevant literature has been identified by means of structured search of bibliographic and other databases; where transparent methodological criteria are used to exclude papers that do not meet an explicit methodological benchmark, and which presents rigorous conclusions about outcomes.

BMJ Open

Where relevant, the Commission Task Force will provide assistance.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "exclude where relevant", ensure the context clearly defines what 'relevant' means to avoid ambiguity. Be specific about the criteria for exclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "exclude where relevant" without providing specific guidelines for determining relevance. Vague criteria can lead to inconsistent application and misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "exclude where relevant" functions as a conditional directive, instructing the reader to omit information or data that is not pertinent to the matter at hand. According to Ludwig, this usage is grammatically correct. Examples provided by Ludwig illustrate its application in various analytical and methodological contexts.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "exclude where relevant" serves as a conditional instruction to omit information or data that is not pertinent to the matter at hand. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While it can be used across various contexts, it is most commonly found in scientific or academic writing where clarity and precision are key. Related phrases such as "omit when applicable" or "remove if pertinent" offer similar functionality. The most important tip is to define what constitutes 'relevant' within the specific context to avoid any ambiguity. Overall, while grammatically sound, the phrase benefits from clear context to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

omit when applicable

Replaces "exclude" with "omit" and "relevant" with "applicable", offering a slightly more formal tone.

eliminate where applicable

Synonym for "exclude", slightly altering the directness.

exclude when inappropriate

Replace the word relevant by inappropriate and keep the same structure and meaning

remove if pertinent

Uses "remove" instead of "exclude" and "pertinent" in place of "relevant", slightly altering the directness.

skip if irrelevant

Replaces "exclude where relevant" with a concise instruction using "skip" and "irrelevant".

only include if relevant

This is the contrary of the main query, and therefore implies the same exclusion

disregard where appropriate

Substitutes "exclude" with "disregard" and "relevant" with "appropriate", softening the directive.

ignore if applicable

Replaces "exclude" with "ignore", making the instruction less formal and direct.

leave out when suitable

Uses "leave out" as a phrasal verb replacing "exclude", creating a more casual tone.

don't include if not pertinent

Phrases the instruction in the negative, specifying when not to include something.

FAQs

How can I use "exclude where relevant" in a sentence?

You can use "exclude where relevant" to indicate that certain information should be omitted if it does not apply to the specific context. For example, "In this analysis, we will focus on the primary factors and "exclude where relevant" any secondary considerations."

What are some alternatives to "exclude where relevant"?

Alternatives include phrases like "omit when applicable", "remove if pertinent", or "disregard where appropriate", depending on the desired tone and level of formality.

Is it better to say "exclude if irrelevant" or "exclude where relevant"?

Both "exclude if irrelevant" and ""exclude where relevant"" are grammatically correct, but the best choice depends on the context. "Exclude if irrelevant" is more direct, while ""exclude where relevant"" implies a more nuanced assessment of pertinence.

What does "relevant" really mean in the context of "exclude where relevant"?

In this context, "relevant" refers to information or elements that are directly connected to or significantly impact the matter being discussed or analyzed. It implies that anything not directly related or impactful should be "excluded" to maintain focus and clarity.