evidence was submitted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence was submitted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as legal documents, reports, or academic papers when referring to the act of providing evidence for consideration. Example: "In the court case, evidence was submitted to support the defendant's claims."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

This time around no evidence was submitted to the court.

The Guardian - Opinion

For the first time, written evidence was submitted by email.

The Guardian - Tech

The evidence was submitted to Fifa by the American executive committee member Chuck Blazer.

The Guardian - Sport

Evidence was submitted that she suffered from postpartum depression, two months after having a baby.

The New York Times

The evidence was submitted by Surrey police, which began an investigation in 2007.

The Guardian

(iv) No new evidence was submitted with a request for reconsideration.

Cornell University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

Following a ruling by the Leveson inquiry last week, the prime minister is being given early access to the evidence being submitted to the inquiry.

The Guardian

This is shown by the significant volume of evidence being submitted to the parallel enquiry into BBC practices by Dinah Rose QC, which was demanded by Lord Patten in October.

The Guardian

It is working to draw up a protocol so that hotels will pay out only if medical evidence is submitted as part of the claim.

The Guardian

142 ADMINISTRATION AND justice is administered to natives according to the Annamite code by mandarins, whose decisions, with the evidence, are submitted to the Resident-Superior for approval.

Cornell University

"Labor believes that these matters should be subject to consideration by the Fair Work Commission where empirical evidence is submitted and the commission makes a decision after hearing all relevant parties' views," O'Connor said.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence was submitted", ensure the context clearly indicates who submitted the evidence and to whom or what it was submitted. This adds clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "evidence was submitted" without specifying who submitted the evidence. This can make the sentence vague and less informative. Instead, specify the source: "The police submitted the evidence."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence was submitted" functions as a statement indicating that evidence has been formally presented or provided for consideration. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is usable in various contexts, and it is frequently found in formal settings. It typically appears in passive constructions, emphasizing the action rather than the actor.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "evidence was submitted" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that evidence has been formally presented. Ludwig AI confirms its usability across various contexts, particularly in news, academic, and scientific domains. When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify who submitted the evidence to maintain clarity. Related phrases like "evidence was presented" and "evidence was provided" can serve as alternatives, each with a slightly different emphasis. By following best practices and avoiding passive voice ambiguity, writers can effectively use this phrase in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evidence has been presented

Replaces "was submitted" with "has been presented", emphasizing the act of presenting evidence.

evidence was presented

Emphasizes the act of presenting the evidence, focusing on the presentation aspect.

evidence was provided

Focuses on the act of providing evidence, highlighting the supply of proof.

data was submitted

Substitutes "evidence" with "data", appropriate when the evidence is primarily data-driven.

proof was submitted

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", emphasizing the conclusive nature of the submitted material.

documentation was submitted

Uses "documentation" instead of "evidence", suitable when referring to formal documents.

testimony was submitted

Uses "testimony" indicating evidence given in a formal setting, like a court.

exhibits were submitted

Replaces "evidence" with "exhibits", referring to physical or visual evidence.

facts were submitted

Replaces "evidence" with "facts," focusing on the factual information provided.

information was submitted

Uses a more general term, "information", instead of "evidence."

FAQs

What can I say instead of "evidence was submitted"?

You can use alternatives like "evidence was presented", "evidence was provided", or "data was submitted" depending on the context.

How to use "evidence was submitted" in a sentence?

To use "evidence was submitted", ensure you clarify who submitted the evidence and to whom. For example: "The report showed that compelling evidence was submitted to the committee".

Is "evidence was submitted" formal or informal?

"Evidence was submitted" is generally considered neutral and can be used in formal and informal contexts. However, the surrounding language will influence the overall tone.

What's the difference between "evidence was submitted" and "evidence was presented"?

"Evidence was submitted" implies the act of providing the evidence, while "evidence was presented" emphasizes the act of showing or displaying the evidence. They are often interchangeable but have slightly different focuses.