evidence was provided

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence was provided" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the submission or presentation of evidence in a report, study, or legal document. Example: "In the investigation, evidence was provided to support the claims made by the witnesses."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No such evidence was provided.

The Guardian - Opinion

(No evidence was provided for the accusation).

The New Yorker

Instead the evidence was provided by former prisoners.

The Guardian

Judge Millette rejected their argument, and no such evidence was provided.

The New York Times

Please confirm that all evidence was provided to the Crown Prosecution Service.

The Guardian

Plenty of evidence was provided (I made a lengthy submission myself).

The Guardian - Opinion

One piece of evidence was provided by studies of patients with hepatitis.

The Guardian

Evidence was provided that physical cues from disAFs quickly induced the formation of aggregates.

Biomaterials

Evidence was provided for the validity and reliability of the SROM as an outcomes measure.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

However, in that study, no evidence was provided confirming H2 roaming during the dissociation of the ethane dication.

Nature

No evidence was provided that 8 months of PT had a direct influence on these markers in obese youths.

The Journal of Pediatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence was provided", ensure the context clearly identifies who provided the evidence and to whom it was provided. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice constructions like "evidence was provided" if it obscures the actor. When possible, rephrase to active voice (e.g., "Researchers provided evidence") for more direct and impactful writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence was provided" functions as a passive construction indicating that evidence has been given or supplied. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

36%

Formal & Business

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evidence was provided" is a grammatically sound passive construction used to indicate the submission or presentation of evidence. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage across various domains. Its frequency is classified as "common", with primary contexts in science, news media, and formal business settings. When using the phrase, clarity is paramount; explicitly stating who provided the evidence and to whom it was provided will avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "proof was presented" and "testimony was given", each with slightly different connotations. While appropriate in many contexts, writers should be mindful of overuse of the passive voice and consider active voice alternatives when clarity and directness are preferred.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

proof was presented

Replaces 'evidence' with 'proof' and 'provided' with 'presented', emphasizing the act of showing evidence.

testimony was given

Substitutes 'evidence' with 'testimony', focusing on verbal evidence, and 'provided' with 'given'.

data was furnished

Replaces 'evidence' with 'data' and 'provided' with 'furnished', suitable for more technical or scientific contexts.

substantiation was presented

Uses a more formal word 'substantiation' for 'evidence', indicating a stronger level of proof.

support was offered

Uses 'support' instead of 'evidence', broadening the meaning to include non-tangible forms of backing.

documentation was submitted

Replaces 'evidence' with 'documentation', focusing on written evidence, and 'provided' with 'submitted'.

facts were disclosed

Replaces 'evidence' with 'facts' and 'provided' with 'disclosed', highlighting the unveiling of information.

confirmation was supplied

Changes 'evidence' to 'confirmation', indicating that the information serves to verify something.

validation was demonstrated

Uses 'validation' instead of 'evidence', suggesting that something has been proven effective or correct.

information was shared

Broadens the scope to include any kind of 'information' that was 'shared', not necessarily proof.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "evidence was provided" to sound more active?

You can use active voice constructions like "researchers provided evidence", "witnesses presented evidence", or "the investigation team submitted evidence" to make the sentence more direct and impactful.

What's the difference between "evidence was provided" and "evidence was presented"?

The phrases are very similar, but "evidence was presented" might imply a more formal or public setting, like a courtroom or conference, while "evidence was provided" is a more general statement.

Is "evidence was provided" too passive for academic writing?

While grammatically correct, excessive use of passive voice can weaken academic writing. Consider using active voice where appropriate, but passive voice is acceptable when the actor is unknown or the action is more important than the actor.

What are some alternatives to "evidence was provided" that don't use the word "evidence"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "proof was presented", "data was furnished", or "support was offered". The best choice depends on the specific meaning you want to convey.