evidence out

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence out" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to presenting or revealing evidence, but as it stands, it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "The lawyer was instructed to evidence out the key documents during the trial."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Though many at the State Department want the evidence out, most of it is classified.

The New York Times

People had been "prevailed upon to take their evidence out", he said.

The Guardian

Smartphones, meanwhile, make it easier than ever before to document police abuse and blast the evidence out everywhere.

Vice

The judge sided with them and threw the wiretap evidence out, leaving the Crown with little else to prove Rizzuto and Sollecito's guilt.

Vice

I don't think you ought to let key evidence out, but I don't see any reason why we shouldn't go into great depth about what generally goes on".

Vice

There is compelling evidence out there.

The Guardian

"These were a few pieces of evidence out of thousands".

The New York Times

There is enough evidence out there to raise concerns".

The New York Times - Food

There is a body of evidence out there".

Independent

Evidence, Out and In, Put Trafficker in Jail Her felony helped fuel a furor.

The New York Times

Finding bags with cocaine straws inside, he imagines a user tossing evidence out a window.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, use more established phrases like "present evidence" or "reveal evidence" instead of the less common "evidence out".

Common error

Avoid using "evidence out" when you mean to say evidence is being extracted or removed. Instead, specify the type of action, such as "discarding evidence" or "suppressing evidence".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence out" functions as a noun followed by a particle, but its grammatical role is ambiguous and non-standard. Ludwig AI explains that the phrase lacks clarity. It often requires contextual interpretation to understand its intended meaning, whether referring to presenting, revealing, or removing evidence.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evidence out" is not a standard or grammatically sound expression in English. As Ludwig AI points out, it lacks clarity and requires contextual interpretation. Analysis of examples reveals its presence in various sources, particularly News & Media, but its usage is often ambiguous, ranging from presenting to removing evidence.

Due to its lack of grammatical correctness, alternative phrases like "present evidence", "reveal evidence", or "remove evidence" are recommended for clearer and more formal communication. While "evidence out" might be encountered, especially in informal contexts, opting for more precise and established expressions ensures better understanding and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

present evidence

Focuses on the act of formally showing or submitting evidence.

reveal evidence

Emphasizes the uncovering or disclosure of evidence that was previously hidden.

produce evidence

Highlights the action of generating or bringing forth evidence for consideration.

submit evidence

Refers to the formal process of handing over evidence to an authority or court.

disclose evidence

Suggests the act of making evidence known, often in a legal or official context.

bring forth evidence

Implies a deliberate effort to present evidence that supports a claim.

take out evidence

Focuses on removing or excluding evidence, often in a legal context.

suppress evidence

Indicates an effort to prevent evidence from being presented or considered.

discard evidence

Highlights the act of getting rid of evidence, either intentionally or unintentionally.

remove evidence

Focuses on the physical act of taking evidence away from a scene or investigation.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "evidence out" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, replace "evidence out" with phrases like "present evidence", "reveal evidence", or "submit evidence", depending on the intended meaning.

What does "evidence out" mean in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, if the intention is to exclude evidence, use "suppress evidence" or "exclude evidence". If it means to present it, then use "offer evidence".

Is "evidence out" grammatically correct?

While the phrase "evidence out" appears in some contexts, it's not considered standard English. Ludwig AI indicates it lacks clarity. It is advisable to use more precise and common alternatives for clarity.

When should I avoid using "evidence out"?

Avoid using "evidence out" in formal writing or situations where clear communication is crucial. Opt for more conventional phrases like "present evidence", "reveal evidence", or "remove evidence" to ensure your message is easily understood.