evidence in support

USAGE SUMMARY

"evidence in support" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are presenting evidence that supports a specific idea, opinion, or claim. For example, "The professor presented evidence in support of his hypothesis that money does not lead to happiness."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is much evidence in support.

The New York Times

This paper presents further evidence in support of the theory.

Electrochimica Acta

"But there is precious little evidence in support".

The Guardian

The evidence in support of a housing bubble is compelling.

The New York Times

There is some evidence in support of this hypothesis.

Nature

So it's evidence in support of that idea.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

However, existing evidence in support of this explanation is mixed.

Social Science & Medicine

However, the evidence in support of preemptive intervention is controversial.

American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Fortunately, there is evidence in support of the latter theory.

The Economist

This is direct evidence in support of previous conclusions that hydrogen acts to increase ionisation.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The evidence in support of this picture is strong but indirect.

Advances in Space Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence in support", ensure that the evidence is directly relevant to the claim you are making. Clearly explain how the evidence supports your argument to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid claiming that the "evidence in support" is conclusive when it is only suggestive or preliminary. Accurately represent the strength and limitations of the evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence in support" functions as a noun phrase that introduces or highlights information used to bolster a claim, hypothesis, or argument. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, as demonstrated by the examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

38%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "evidence in support" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to introduce supporting information for a claim. According to Ludwig AI, it is considered correct and usable in written English. It is commonly found in science, news and media, and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure the evidence is directly relevant and accurately represents the strength of the claim. Alternatives like "supporting evidence" or "corroborating evidence" can provide nuanced variations. Overall, "evidence in support" is a valuable tool for building persuasive and well-supported arguments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Supporting evidence

Word order is different, but it carries a similar meaning.

Corroborating evidence

Replaces "supporting" with a more formal synonym, "corroborating".

Proof to support

Emphasizes the role of the evidence as proof.

Justification for

Focuses on the act of justifying something with evidence.

Rationale for

Highlights the reasoning behind a particular claim or action.

Grounds for

Indicates the basis or foundation for a belief or argument.

Basis for

Highlights the foundational nature of the supporting information.

Confirmation of

Focuses on confirming or validating a statement with evidence.

Validation of

Stresses the act of validating or proving something.

Backing for

Uses a more informal term, "backing", to indicate support.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence in support" in a sentence?

You can use "evidence in support" to introduce information that backs up a claim or hypothesis. For example, "The study provides "evidence in support" of the theory that early childhood education has long-term benefits."

What are some alternatives to "evidence in support"?

Alternatives include "supporting evidence", "corroborating evidence", or "proof to support", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "evidence in support of" or "evidence that supports"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct. "Evidence in support of" is often used when the evidence is being presented as a general category or body of information. "Evidence that supports" is used to highlight the direct action of the evidence in bolstering a claim.

How do I effectively marshal "evidence in support" of my argument?

Gather credible and relevant evidence, clearly explain how each piece of evidence supports your claim, and address any potential counterarguments. Strong "evidence in support" enhances the persuasiveness of your argument.