evidence in question

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence in question" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to refer to specific evidence that is being discussed or examined in a particular context. Example: "The court will review the evidence in question to determine its relevance to the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Pohl's 4 June 2014 order concerning the disposition of the evidence in question was not provided to the defense until January 2016.

The Guardian

Mr. Jeter's lawyers argue that the evidence in question is so vague as to be meaningless, and are challenging the state to provide specifics.

The New York Times

But Ms. Houston would not comment on the possibility that the evidence in question might have been tampered with while under police custody.

The New York Times

But before ruling on a secrets claim, and possibly dismissing a lawsuit, judges would be required to review the documents or evidence in question instead of just accepting assertions in government affidavits.

The New York Times

While extensive classification rules render central facts in the case difficult to conclusively determine, other rulings suggest the evidence in question concerns Mohammed's torture by the CIA at secret prisons.

The Guardian

The evidence in question is known as the Oregon Petition - one of the feeblest factoids in the climate science denial hymnbook that's cited almost as often as it has been debunked.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

While that line of appeal is often considered a last resort, Judge Karazin's ruling might make that argument easier because of his findings that Mr. Skakel's trial lawyer, Mickey Sherman, could have discovered some of the evidence now in question if he had pursued it more diligently.

The New York Times

Researchers with expertise in the relevant subject matter and methodologies should be consulted when the value of a piece of evidence is in question.

BioData Mining

Still, his exoneration of Wilpon and Katz, while not dispositive, is certainly relevant evidence in the question of their knowledge and culpability.

The New Yorker

In some cases evidence may become hypotheses when the evidence itself is in question.

Security Informatics

We also acknowledge that the supporting evidence for these uncertain variants will vary in its quality and quantity and that the evidence will never be unequivocal for the simple fact that in light of unequivocal evidence, the variant in question would otherwise have been previously reported as disease causing.

Genetics in Medicine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence in question", ensure the context clearly identifies what specific evidence you are referring to. Avoid ambiguity by providing sufficient background information.

Common error

Avoid using "evidence in question" without clearly defining or referencing the evidence you are referring to. Readers may not understand what you are talking about, thus impacting comprehension of the text.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence in question" functions as a noun phrase, specifically identifying the evidence under scrutiny or consideration. Ludwig AI confirms it is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "evidence in question" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, primarily in News & Media and Scientific domains. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability, while its function is to specifically denote the piece of evidence currently under consideration. When using this phrase, clarity is paramount to ensure your audience understands the evidence you're referencing. Alternatives such as "pertinent evidence" or ""relevant evidence"" can offer slight variations in emphasis. By keeping this guidance in mind, you can effectively incorporate "evidence in question" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

relevant evidence

Focuses on the relevance of the evidence being discussed.

pertinent evidence

Emphasizes the direct connection of the evidence to the matter at hand.

the evidence at hand

Highlights the availability and immediacy of the evidence.

the proof in question

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", emphasizing its role in establishing a fact.

the data under consideration

Shifts focus to the data being evaluated as evidence.

the aforementioned evidence

Refers to evidence previously mentioned.

the subject evidence

Identifies the evidence as the topic of discussion.

the contested evidence

Highlights that the evidence is being disputed.

the specific evidence

Emphasizes that a particular piece of evidence is being addressed.

the cited evidence

Indicates that the evidence has been formally referenced.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence in question" in a sentence?

Use "evidence in question" when you want to refer to a specific piece of evidence that has already been mentioned or is the focus of a discussion. For instance, "The lab results represent the "relevant evidence" in question."

What are some alternatives to "evidence in question"?

You can use alternatives like "pertinent evidence", ""relevant evidence"", or "evidence at hand" depending on the context.

Is "evidence in question" formal or informal?

"Evidence in question" is suitable for both formal and neutral contexts. It is commonly found in news reports, academic papers, and legal documents.

What does "evidence in question" refer to?

It refers to the specific piece of evidence that is being discussed, examined, or challenged within a particular context.