relevant evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "relevant evidence" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It refers to information or facts that are applicable and useful in supporting an argument or proving a point. This phrase is often used in legal, academic, and scientific contexts. Example: The prosecution presented relevant evidence, including DNA samples and surveillance footage, to prove the defendant's guilt in the murder trial.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Judges limit what jurors may hear to the most reliable, concrete, and narrowly relevant evidence.

The New Yorker

"Cases will be evaluated on an individual basis, considering all relevant evidence," Ms. Hawkins said.

The New York Times

It is really a question of my evaluation of the relevant evidence".

The New York Times

And they can consider the broadest range of relevant evidence to reach their verdicts.

The New York Times

So it seems only fair to present the Sun on Sunday's publisher with relevant evidence.

The Guardian

And where relevant evidence already exists it may be overlooked or ignored.

The Guardian

It is also of interest since the relevant evidence grew out of the Inquiry's proceedings themselves.

The Guardian

The Beckley Foundation's focus on health-oriented policies demands a research programme to gather relevant evidence.

The Guardian

He intended to prove the existence of a conspiracy led by Paine, but Goss ruled all the relevant evidence inadmissible.

The New Yorker

"While the review is nearing the end of its work, it continues to conduct interviews and to receive relevant evidence.

The Guardian

He further alleges that The Sun has failed to provide "all the relevant evidence in its possession to the police".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "relevant evidence", ensure it directly supports your argument and is clearly linked to the point you are making. Avoid including tangential information that could dilute the impact of your key evidence.

Common error

Avoid assuming the audience understands the relevance of your evidence. Explicitly explain how the evidence connects to your argument to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relevant evidence" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "relevant" modifies the noun "evidence". It describes evidence that is pertinent and applicable to a particular issue or situation. As Ludwig AI points out, it is commonly used across multiple domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

51%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "relevant evidence" refers to information or facts that are applicable and useful in supporting an argument or proving a point. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and legal domains. When using this phrase, ensure that the evidence is directly connected to your argument and that its relevance is clear to your audience. Avoid assumptions about the audience's understanding. Also as Ludwig AI notes, the phrase's high frequency and consistent usage across authoritative sources affirm its importance in effective communication and decision-making processes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

pertinent proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" which implies a higher degree of certainty.

applicable data

Substitutes "evidence" with "data", focusing on factual information.

germane facts

Uses "facts" instead of "evidence", emphasizing objective truth.

material information

Replaces "relevant" with "material", highlighting the importance of the information.

significant details

Focuses on the importance of the "details" provided.

appropriate documentation

Highlights the formal nature of the "documentation".

suitable indications

Uses "indications" instead of "evidence", implying signs or clues.

related facts

Offers a broader scope than strictly "relevant" information.

connected details

Uses "connected" rather than "relevant", suggesting interconnectedness.

admissible proof

Focuses on evidence that is acceptable under specific rules or guidelines.

FAQs

How is "relevant evidence" used in legal contexts?

In law, "relevant evidence" is admissible in court if it tends to prove or disprove a fact at issue in the case. However, even if relevant, the evidence may be excluded if it is unfairly prejudicial, misleading, or constitutes hearsay.

What's the difference between "relevant evidence" and "circumstantial evidence"?

"Relevant evidence" directly proves a fact, while "circumstantial evidence" indirectly proves a fact by suggesting a reasonable inference. Circumstantial evidence requires the jury to make inferences, while relevant evidence speaks directly to the matter at hand.

How do you determine if evidence is "relevant evidence"?

Evidence is considered "relevant evidence" if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence, and the fact is of consequence in determining the action. The evidence must be both probative and material.

Can "relevant evidence" be excluded from a trial?

Yes, even if evidence is deemed "relevant evidence", it can still be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.