evidence against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe proof or facts that show someone may be guilty of something. For example: "The police had strong evidence against him: fingerprints on the weapon, a witness who identified him, and video footage of him at the scene."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Reference

Social Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I've no evidence against you.

The New Yorker

Dr. Jones's "evidence" against such a system?

The New York Times

The evidence against Mr Hussein seems overwhelming.

The Economist

The evidence against him is damning.

The New York Times

The evidence against Volpe was overwhelming.

The New Yorker

The evidence against Major Hasan was overwhelming.

The New York Times

"There's absolutely no evidence against him".

The New York Times

The collected evidence against them is damning.

The New York Times - Sports

The evidence against Weill was more circumstantial.

The New Yorker

-- provided evidence against Mr. Forney.

The New York Times

It was used in evidence against Malinski.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence against", ensure that the context clearly indicates what the evidence is opposing. Providing specific details strengthens your argument and enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid presenting circumstantial evidence as definitive "evidence against" without proper corroboration. Clearly differentiate between suggestive clues and conclusive proof to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence against" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it denotes information or proof that contradicts a particular claim or indicates wrongdoing. Examples in Ludwig demonstrate its use across various contexts, from legal to scientific.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Academia

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "evidence against" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to denote proof or facts that contradict a claim or suggest wrongdoing. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans diverse contexts, from formal academic discourse to neutral news reporting. Analysis reveals a neutral to formal register, emphasizing the importance of context in its interpretation. While alternatives like "counter evidence" or "proof opposing" exist, "evidence against" remains a clear and effective choice. Remember to corroborate your claims with verifiable sources. The most frequent and authoritative sources include The New York Times, The Guardian and Cornell University.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

counter evidence

A more concise and direct synonym for "evidence against".

proof opposing

This alternative highlights the contradictory nature of the evidence.

facts disproving

Emphasizes the factual basis of the evidence and its capacity to negate a claim.

indications contradicting

Focuses on the suggestive nature of the evidence and its conflict with a particular idea.

arguments refuting

Highlights the use of evidence in constructing arguments that challenge a particular stance.

data invalidating

Focuses on the use of data to undermine or nullify a theory or hypothesis.

disconfirming evidence

This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the act of disproving a hypothesis.

damning evidence

This alternative suggests that the evidence is particularly damaging or incriminating.

incriminating evidence

This suggests the evidence directly implicates someone in wrongdoing.

adverse evidence

This alternative highlights the negative or harmful nature of the evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence against" in a sentence?

You can use "evidence against" to indicate proof or facts that contradict a claim or suggest someone's guilt. For example, "The lawyer presented compelling "evidence against" the defendant."

What are some alternatives to using "evidence against"?

Alternatives include "counter evidence", "proof opposing", or "indications contradicting", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "evidence against" or "evidence for"?

It depends on the context. "Evidence against" suggests opposition or contradiction, while "evidence for" supports a claim. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects the nature of the evidence.

How strong does "evidence against" need to be to be considered valid?

The strength of "evidence against" depends on the context and the burden of proof required. In legal settings, it must be sufficient to establish a reasonable doubt or prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.