even remotely valuable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "even remotely valuable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express doubt about the worth or significance of something, suggesting that it may not have any value at all. Example: "I don't think this old piece of equipment is even remotely valuable; it hasn't worked in years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Anything even remotely valuable had been stripped.

BBC

After the last Mig-29 took off back to Russia in 1991, the military base was left open and unguarded and was quickly looted of anything even remotely valuable.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

And what the heck does any movie star do that's even remotely as valuable as powering this whole nation and keeping the wheels of the nation moving?

Forbes

People will buy just about anything that smells of controversy, and if the public wants to believe they're learning something new or valuable or even remotely connected to the truth, it's hard to begrudge publishers for reaping the profit.

Huffington Post

Not even remotely.

The New York Times

Or even remotely proportionate.

The Guardian - Sport

"Not even remotely realistic".

The New York Times

Even remotely like them.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Nothing else seemed even remotely the same.

The New York Times - Sports

And you are not even remotely qualified.

The New Yorker

Even remotely, his style is imperious.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "even remotely valuable" when you want to emphasize the lack of significant worth or importance, particularly when contrasting it with an expectation of value.

Common error

Avoid using "even remotely valuable" when the item in question clearly possesses some degree of value. The phrase is best suited for situations where the worth is highly questionable or essentially nonexistent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "even remotely valuable" functions as an adverbial modifier to the adjective "valuable", intensifying the negation of value. It is used to express that something is not just lacking value, but is so devoid of worth that it barely registers as valuable, supported by Ludwig's analysis.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "even remotely valuable" is a phrase used to strongly deny the presence of worth or significance. Ludwig's analysis confirms it is grammatically sound and serves to emphasize a lack of value. While not a common expression, appearing rarely in corpora, when it is used, it is found primarily in news and media contexts. The expert rating indicates its appropriate usage in such professional settings. If you aim to convey that something has practically no value, "even remotely valuable" is a suitable choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

slightly valuable

Indicates a small degree of value, suggesting the item possesses some worth, however minimal.

marginally valuable

Emphasizes that the value is at the edge of being significant, suggesting a minimal degree of usefulness or worth.

minimally valuable

Implies that something has a very small amount of value or importance.

somewhat valuable

Suggests a moderate level of value, implying the item is more valuable than just "slightly" but not highly so.

hardly valuable

Stresses the lack of value, implying that it is difficult to consider the item as having any worth.

scarcely valuable

Suggests the item has very little value, close to being worthless.

of negligible value

Highlights that the item's value is so small that it is practically insignificant.

not particularly valuable

Indicates that the item does have some value, but it is not noteworthy or remarkable.

relatively valuable

Something has value when compared to something else.

remotely important

Shifts the focus from value to importance, questioning whether something has even a slight degree of significance.

FAQs

How can I use "even remotely valuable" in a sentence?

You can use "even remotely valuable" to describe something that has very little to no worth, such as, "After the flood, nothing in the house was "even remotely valuable"."

What are some alternatives to "even remotely valuable"?

Alternatives include "slightly valuable", "minimally valuable", or "of negligible value", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "not even remotely valuable" or "not remotely valuable"?

"Not even remotely valuable" emphasizes the lack of value more strongly than "not remotely valuable". Both are grammatically correct, but the inclusion of "even" adds intensity.

What's the difference between "valuable" and "even remotely valuable"?

"Valuable" indicates that something has worth, while "even remotely valuable" suggests it has very little or no worth, implying a significant disparity between expectation and reality.