evaluated to be

USAGE SUMMARY

"evaluated to be" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are speaking about something that has been reviewed or judged. For example, "The student's essay was evaluated to be excellent by the professor."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

pHpzc was evaluated to be 6.29.

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

The upper limit was evaluated to be 8000 g/mol.

Polymer

The coefficients of performance were evaluated to be 3 11.

Desalination

Thus, the doubling time during this period could be evaluated to be 14 h.

Harvard University

If only CT values were displayed, the reference gene were always run and evaluated to be stably expressed.

Nature

This release was evaluated to be in the range 61 72 mol% on initial sulphur basis.

Chemical Engineering Science

The exchange current density was evaluated to be 4.57 mA dm−2.

Electrochimica Acta

Finally Ksp−1, the solubility product of cuprous oxide, was evaluated to be 3.0 × 10−15.

Electrochimica Acta

The diffusion coefficient has been evaluated to be about 8 × 10−6 cm2 s−10−6

Electrochimica Acta

Furthermore, the accelerated service life of the electrode is evaluated to be 4 A cm−2.

Electrochimica Acta

The electrical resistance of an individual joint was evaluated to be 1.35 Ohms.

Carbon

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "evaluated to be" when you want to emphasize a formal or objective assessment process. It suggests a degree of rigor and analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "evaluated to be" in informal writing or conversations. Simpler alternatives like "considered" or "thought to be" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluated to be" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has undergone a process of assessment or judgment. It's frequently used to report the result of an evaluation, as shown in examples from Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Formal & Business

3%

News & Media

2%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "evaluated to be" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates a formal process of assessment or judgement. While versatile, it's best suited for technical writing and formal reports, and less appropriate for casual communication. Alternatives like "assessed as" or "considered to be" can be used in different contexts. Its primary function is to objectively communicate results of analysis, ensuring clarity and precision in professional communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed as

Focuses on the assessment aspect with a slightly different structure.

considered to be

Emphasizes consideration or opinion rather than formal evaluation.

deemed to be

Implies a formal judgment or decision.

judged as

Highlights the act of judging based on certain criteria.

determined to be

Suggests a conclusion reached after investigation or analysis.

found to be

Indicates a discovery or finding through observation or testing.

estimated as

Focuses on providing an approximate value or quantity.

calculated as

Implies a precise, mathematical determination.

measured as

Highlights the process of measurement in determining a value.

appraised as

Similar to assessed but often used in contexts of valuation or worth.

FAQs

How to use "evaluated to be" in a sentence?

Use "evaluated to be" when referring to a formal assessment or judgment. For instance, "The experiment's results were evaluated to be statistically significant."

What can I say instead of "evaluated to be"?

You can use alternatives like "assessed as", "considered to be", or "deemed to be" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "evaluated to be" or "evaluated as"?

"Evaluated to be" and "evaluated as" are both grammatically correct, but "evaluated to be" is more common when followed by an adjective or noun phrase, while "evaluated as" is more common before an adjective. For example: The risk was "evaluated to be" high vs. The risk was "evaluated as" risky.

What's the difference between "evaluated to be" and "assessed to be"?

Both "evaluated to be" and "assessed to be" imply a process of judgment. "Evaluated to be" suggests a more formal and potentially data-driven analysis, while "assessed to be" can be more general.