evaluated retrospectively

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evaluated retrospectively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the assessment or analysis of something after it has occurred, often in contexts like research, studies, or performance reviews. Example: "The project's success was evaluated retrospectively to determine its long-term impact on the community."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Tumour response was evaluated retrospectively according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (Therasse et al, 2000).

British Journal of Cancer

Response to chemotherapy was evaluated retrospectively according to the World Health Organization response evaluation criteria (Miller et al, 1981).

British Journal of Cancer

Complications (intraoperative, intradistraction, and postdistraction) were evaluated retrospectively.

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology

Study design: Four hundred fifty-four patients who underwent 454 ICSI cycles were evaluated retrospectively.

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

This presumed advantage was evaluated retrospectively for patients with arthritis in otherwise anatomically normal hips.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

The recorded strobovideolaryngoscopic examinations of 34 consecutive patients were evaluated retrospectively by five raters.

Journal of Voice

Patient and disease characteristics, radiographic responses, and survival outcomes were evaluated retrospectively for the three groups.The CNS response rate was 32.3%.

Stanford University

In this study; clinical findings, QT and QTc dispersions of the patients who were diagnosed as OIS were evaluated retrospectively.

European Journal of Paediatric Neurology

In fact, a large group of 474 GERD patients were evaluated retrospectively to determine potential eligibility for endoscopic treatment using the standard selection criteria for patient enrollment in these trials.32 Only 88 patients (19%) fulfilled these eligibility criteria.

Nature

In a western region of Saudi Arabia, an area with a high prevalence of urolithiasis, the effect of climatic changes, Ramadan fasting and pilgrimage festival on the occurrence of urinary stone colic in males was evaluated retrospectively (Al-Hadramy, 1997).

Nature

We have also evaluated retrospectively these different criteria on cohort was constituted since 2005.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evaluated retrospectively", ensure the context clearly indicates the timeframe and criteria used for the evaluation. Be specific about what data sources were used and the methods employed in the retrospective analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "evaluated retrospectively" when describing ongoing monitoring or evaluation processes. This phrase implies a completed event or period that is being analyzed after its conclusion, not during its occurrence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluated retrospectively" functions as a verb phrase, typically used as part of the passive voice, to indicate that an assessment or analysis was conducted on past events or data. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples in Ludwig show its use in science, research and academia.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "evaluated retrospectively" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as validated by Ludwig AI, primarily found in formal, scientific, and academic contexts. It denotes that an assessment or analysis was performed on past events, utilizing data available after the events had already occurred. When using the phrase, ensure that the timeframe and data sources for the evaluation are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives such as "assessed in hindsight" or "reviewed post-event" to modify the nuance of the sentence. The phrase is not suitable for describing concurrent or ongoing evaluations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed in hindsight

This phrase emphasizes the use of knowledge available only after the event to conduct the assessment.

reviewed post-event

This is a more general term suggesting a review took place after the event, without specifying the depth of analysis.

analyzed after the fact

This highlights the analysis aspect, focusing on breaking down the event into components for examination after it happened.

examined retroactively

This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the application of current knowledge to past events.

investigated subsequently

This suggests a more thorough and formal inquiry that occurred after the initial event.

determined in retrospect

Focuses on reaching a conclusion or decision based on looking back at the event.

appraised historically

This phrase implies a valuation or judgment from a historical perspective.

looked back on and judged

This alternative is more descriptive and less formal, emphasizing the act of judging based on past events.

revisited for analysis

This phrase implies a second look at the event specifically for the purpose of detailed analysis.

post-occurrence assessment

This is a noun phrase that refers to the assessment done after the event.

FAQs

What does "evaluated retrospectively" mean?

The phrase "evaluated retrospectively" means that something has been assessed or analyzed after it has already occurred, typically using information and data available from the past.

How can I use "evaluated retrospectively" in a sentence?

You can use "evaluated retrospectively" to describe how data or outcomes were analyzed after a certain period. For instance, "The effectiveness of the treatment was "evaluated retrospectively" after one year of patient follow-up."

What are some alternatives to "evaluated retrospectively"?

Some alternatives to "evaluated retrospectively" include "assessed in hindsight", "reviewed post-event", or "analyzed after the fact". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "evaluated retrospectively" or "retrospectively evaluated"?

Both "evaluated retrospectively" and "retrospectively evaluated" are grammatically correct. However, "evaluated retrospectively" is generally more common and may sound more natural to native English speakers. The choice depends on the sentence structure and emphasis you want to create.