evaluate submissions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evaluate submissions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the process of assessing or reviewing entries, proposals, or applications submitted for consideration. Example: "The committee will evaluate submissions based on creativity, feasibility, and overall impact."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Judges will evaluate submissions throughout October and November and announce winners in December.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

It should publicly articulate an agreed upon set of criteria against which judges must evaluate submissions, and require that judges present a written justification for their choices.

The Guardian - Books

The team will evaluate submissions and fund ideas based on the idea and dedication of the student.

TechCrunch

In this way, the transit authority will be able to evaluate submissions with the true full picture in terms of overall system life cycle cost.

Urban Rail Transit

Both organizations evaluate submissions for new drugs and/or new clinical indications based on comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness, and then generate recommendations for funding.

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research

Another major change in the ITA is that EHP will actively evaluate submissions for research that might provide knowledge, products, or technologies that could be directly misapplied to pose a threat to public health and safety.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

In 2015 Dr. Merkel joined the AJGS as an Associate Editor responsible for evaluating submissions in the fields of Hydrogeology & Mining Geology.

Springer

In 2015 Dr. Lee joined the AJGS as an Associate Editor responsible for evaluating submissions in Environmental, Geotechnical and Applied Sciences.

Springer

In 2016 Dr. Giroux joined the AJGS as an Associate Editor responsible for evaluating submissions in Applied Geophysics.

Springer

In 2014 Dr. Banerjee joined the AJGS as an Associate Editor responsible for evaluating submissions in Sedimentology and Petroleum Geology.

Springer

This means identifying, examining and evaluating submissions for indicators of contract cheating before releasing grades to students.

International Journal for Educational Integrity

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evaluate submissions", ensure that the criteria for evaluation are clearly defined and communicated beforehand to maintain fairness and transparency.

Common error

To avoid subjectivity, always use a well-defined rubric or set of criteria when you "evaluate submissions". This ensures consistent and unbiased assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluate submissions" functions as a verb phrase where "evaluate" is the transitive verb and "submissions" is its direct object. Ludwig AI validates its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evaluate submissions" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to describe the process of assessing submitted materials based on predefined criteria. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is commonly used in academic, scientific, and news media contexts. While not exceedingly frequent, its usage is consistent and clear. Key considerations include establishing clear evaluation criteria and avoiding subjective assessments. Alternatives such as "assess entries", "review applications", or "judge proposals" can be used depending on the specific context. Ludwig's analysis indicates that using a well-defined rubric can enhance objectivity when using "evaluate submissions".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assess entries

Focuses more on grading or judging the quality of what was submitted.

review applications

Specifically refers to examining formal requests or candidacy documents.

judge proposals

Emphasizes making a formal judgment on suggested plans or ideas.

examine filings

Implies a detailed inspection of official documents.

scrutinize documents

Highlights a careful and critical assessment of written materials.

grade assignments

Directly related to educational context, focusing on scoring student work.

analyze entries

Focuses on breaking down and understanding the components of submissions.

consider applications

Suggests a thoughtful and deliberate review process.

process requests

Describes handling and managing incoming demands or inquiries.

audit submissions

Involves a systematic check of submissions, typically for compliance or accuracy.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "evaluate submissions"?

Alternatives include "assess entries", "review applications", or "judge proposals" depending on the context.

How can I use "evaluate submissions" in a sentence?

You can say, "The panel will "evaluate submissions" based on originality and impact" or "We need to "evaluate submissions" carefully to select the best candidate".

What factors should I consider when I "evaluate submissions"?

Consider factors such as relevance, originality, feasibility, and overall quality when you "evaluate submissions".

What is the difference between "evaluate submissions" and "review submissions"?

"Evaluate submissions" implies a judgment or assessment of value, while "review submissions" simply means examining them.