estimated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "estimated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly as it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The project costs were estimated with a detailed analysis of the budget."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

CFR was estimated with TTE and dipyridamole.

International Journal of Cardiology

Specifications have been estimated with instrumental variables.

Latin American Economic Review

Notes Densities estimated with an Epanechnikov kernel.

SERIEs

Drug release was estimated with HPLC.

Nanoscale Research Letters

c Transmission estimated with dual channel prior.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Model (3) was estimated with Laplace approximation.

Journal for Labour Market Research

b Transmission estimated with bright channel.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Permeabilities estimated with the slug tests were slightly lower than those estimated with the recovery tests.

Earth, Planets and Space

System resistance parameters are estimated with a point integration method.

Structural Safety

The model is estimated with data from southwestern Michigan, USA.

Ecological Economics

All parameters were estimated with acceptable precision (standard error < 30%).

Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing how an estimate was obtained, specify the method or tool directly using phrases like "calculated using", "assessed via", or "determined by means of" to enhance clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "estimated with" as it often lacks clarity about who or what performed the estimation. Instead, opt for active constructions that clearly identify the estimator and the method used.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "estimated with" is often intended to describe the method or tool used in a process of estimation. While frequent, Ludwig AI indicates that it is considered grammatically incorrect. Alternative phrasings can provide enhanced clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "estimated with" appears frequently in scientific literature and technical writing, Ludwig AI highlights that it's often considered grammatically incorrect. This phrase typically aims to describe the method or tool used to arrive at an estimate. To enhance clarity and precision, consider using alternatives like "calculated using", "assessed via", or "determined by means of". These alternatives provide better grammatical structure and clearly specify the estimation process. Although "estimated with" is common, especially in scientific contexts, opting for more precise language will improve the quality and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

calculated using

This alternative focuses on the method or tool employed in the calculation, emphasizing a direct relationship between the calculation and the means.

assessed via

This alternative is useful when estimation involves an assessment process or a specific methodology used to derive the estimate.

determined by means of

This phrase highlights the tools or processes that facilitate the determination of an estimate.

evaluated through

This alternative emphasizes the evaluation process used to arrive at an estimate, particularly when considering multiple factors.

approximated by applying

Suitable when the estimation involves applying a specific formula, model, or set of rules to get an approximate result.

derived from

Indicates that the estimate is a result or product of a specific data source, formula, or process.

obtained from

Used when the estimate is directly sourced from a particular method or measurement.

inferred using

Highlights that the estimate is reached through a process of deduction or reasoning based on available data.

computed via

Similar to "calculated using", but more apt for estimations performed through algorithmic processes.

predicted based on

This alternative is used when the estimation is a forecast or prediction based on prior data or models.

FAQs

How can I use "calculated using" instead of "estimated with"?

Instead of saying "The distance was estimated with GPS", you can say "The distance was "calculated using" GPS" for better clarity.

What are some alternatives to "estimated with" for scientific writing?

In scientific writing, consider using phrases like "assessed via", "determined by means of", or "evaluated through" as alternatives to "estimated with" for increased precision and formality.

Which is more grammatically correct: "estimated with" or "estimated by"?

While "estimated with" is frequently used, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. "estimated by" is more appropriate, but alternatives like "calculated using" provide even greater clarity.

How can I avoid using "estimated with" in my writing?

Focus on specifying the method or tool used for estimation. For example, instead of "The volume was estimated with the formula", say "The volume was calculated using the formula".