erred in holding

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "erred in holding" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to indicate that a court or authority made a mistake in its decision or ruling. Example: "The appellate court found that the lower court erred in holding that the evidence was inadmissible."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

As a result, the ruling stated, "the court erred in holding the commission's conduct arbitrary and capricious" with respect to five properties.

The New York Times - Arts

The court, however, erred in holding that the Secretary acted within her discretion in prematurely rejecting any amended returns that would be the result of ongoing manual recounts.

The New York Times

In its appeal, Microsoft argued that the appeals court had erred in holding that Microsoft's defense — that the patent was invalid — must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.

The New York Times - Tech

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

BRAD DELONG catalogues the consensus on three mistakes the Fed made leading up to and during this crisis, and also gives a balanced and anguished analysis of a fourth: whether Alan Greenspan erred in keeping interest rates as low as he did.I agree with almost everything here, in particular that it was almost impossible at the time to believe the Fed was erring in holding rates too low.

The Economist

Eleven years and one page in the report later, the CIA acknowledged it "erred" in not holding anyone accountable for Rahman's death.

The Guardian - Opinion

The district court erred, however, in holding that the university's 1999 and 2000 admissions policy, which remains in place today, satisfies this court's narrow tailoring requirements.

The New York Times

In the suit the tenants association maintains that the housing agency erred in failing to hold a public hearing on the harassment charges.

The New York Times

And we have a legal ruling by a District Court of Appeal, as you say, that has held that they erred in that, that they did have a mandatory obligation to continue the count.

The New York Times

Galloway also appears to consider Khan, a Muslim, an inadequate practitioner of his faith, telling the Evening Standard that the Labour man erred by holding the Koran "in his left hand" when he met the monarch and that this "wasn't missed by people who care about these things".

The Guardian

The court held that Rakoff erred in concluding that the S.E.C. should privilege the public's "overriding interest in knowing the truth".

The New Yorker

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said a federal court in Arizona erred in ruling that BioGenex, a privately held competitor, had not infringed a Ventana patent on automated methods for staining microscope slides.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "erred in holding", ensure that the context clearly identifies the specific decision or ruling that is being questioned. This provides clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "erred in holding" without specifying the precise aspect of the decision that was flawed. Vague statements weaken your critique. Always provide specific details to support your claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "erred in holding" functions as a critical assessment of a judgment or decision, typically in a legal or formal setting. As Ludwig AI highlights, it indicates that an error was made in the process of making a formal determination.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "erred in holding" is a phrase used to indicate that a court or other authority made a mistake in its decision or ruling. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically sound and most commonly found in news and media contexts, particularly when discussing legal matters. While alternatives exist, the phrase is best suited for formal and professional settings where precise legal terminology is valued. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly identifies the specific error and the decision it affected to provide clarity and strengthen your argument. Remember to avoid overgeneralizing the error and specify the flaw in the decision. Use in sentences as "The court "erred in holding" that...". Therefore, be precise, be specific, and be clear.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

made an error in deciding

Replaces "erred" with "made an error" and "holding" with "deciding", focusing on the act of making a mistake in the decision process.

was mistaken in ruling

Substitutes "erred" with "was mistaken" and "holding" with "ruling", emphasizing the incorrect nature of the judgment.

incorrectly determined

Replaces the entire phrase with a more concise expression, focusing on the incorrectness of the determination.

wrongly concluded

Similar to "incorrectly determined", but emphasizes the act of reaching a wrong conclusion.

misjudged the decision

Focuses on the act of misjudging the decision.

failed to properly assess

Highlights the failure in assessing the situation accurately.

was at fault for deciding

Emphasizes the fault or responsibility for the incorrect decision.

showed poor judgment in deciding

Highlights the poor judgment involved in making the decision.

made an unsound judgment in deciding

Replaces "erred" with "made an unsound judgment" and "holding" with "deciding", highlighting the lack of soundness in the judgment.

was misguided in their judgment

Focuses on the misguided nature of the judgment.

FAQs

What does "erred in holding" mean in a legal context?

In legal terms, "erred in holding" means that a court or other legal authority made a mistake in its decision or ruling. It suggests that the court's judgment was based on incorrect application of the law or a misinterpretation of facts.

Which is more appropriate, "erred in holding" or "made a mistake in ruling"?

"Erred in holding" is often used in formal legal contexts, while "made a mistake in ruling" is more general. Both phrases convey the same basic meaning, but "erred in holding" has a more specific legal connotation.

What are some alternatives to "erred in holding" that I can use in a legal document?

Some alternatives include "was mistaken in ruling", "incorrectly determined", or "wrongly concluded". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How do I use "erred in holding" in a sentence?

You can use "erred in holding" to indicate that a court or authority made a mistake in its decision. For example: "The appellate court found that the lower court "erred in holding" that the evidence was inadmissible."