equivalent of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equivalent of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that one thing is equal in value, function, or meaning to another. Example: "In mathematics, the term 'pi' is often considered the equivalent of the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's his equivalent of bling".

Independent

The banking equivalent of Toyota?

Independent

The cabaret equivalent of "Smash"?

The New York Times - Arts

It's the equivalent of baseball purgatory.

The New York Times

There is no equivalent of Anzac Day.

Independent

Sessioning is the magicians' equivalent of jamming.

The New Yorker

That is the equivalent of 91 acres.

The New York Times

(the electric equivalent of fuel economy).

The New York Times

There is no equivalent of Eilts.

Independent

It's the camp equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome.

The New York Times

"About the equivalent of a granola bar".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "equivalent of" when you want to draw a clear comparison between two distinct items or concepts, highlighting their similar value or function. For example, "Earning this certification is the "equivalent of" having five years of experience."

Common error

Avoid using "equivalent of" when only a loose association exists. Overusing it can weaken your writing. Instead of saying "This vaguely reminds me of that, so it's the "equivalent of" that", clarify the specific similarity with a more precise comparison.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equivalent of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or noun phrase. It serves to establish a comparison or representational relationship between two distinct entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound construction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Encyclopedias

12%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equivalent of" is a versatile tool for drawing comparisons and establishing relationships between different concepts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and frequently used, particularly in News & Media, Encyclopedia and Science contexts. When writing, make sure to use it accurately to indicate genuine equivalence rather than loose similarity. Consider alternatives like "equal to" or "comparable to" for nuanced meanings. By understanding its function and potential pitfalls, you can effectively leverage "equivalent of" to enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equal to

This alternative directly expresses equality in value or measure.

comparable to

Suggests a similarity that allows for comparison, though not necessarily perfect equality.

tantamount to

Indicates that something is virtually equal to something else, often in effect or consequence.

akin to

Implies a resemblance or similarity, often used in a figurative sense.

analogous to

Highlights a similarity in some respects between otherwise dissimilar things.

interchangeable with

Focuses on the ability to use one thing in place of another without significant difference.

on par with

Indicates equality in status, quality, or performance.

commensurate with

Suggests a proportional relationship or correspondence in size or degree.

in the same league as

Implies a similar level of quality, skill, or importance.

a substitute for

Indicates that one thing can replace another, often temporarily.

FAQs

How can I use "equivalent of" in a sentence?

Use "equivalent of" to compare the value, function, or meaning of two different things. For instance, "This amount is the "equivalent of" one month's rent".

What can I say instead of "equivalent of"?

You can use alternatives like "equal to", "comparable to", or "tantamount to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "equivalent of" or "equivalence of"?

"Equivalent of" is used to compare two things directly. "Equivalence of" refers to the state or fact of being equivalent. For example, "The "equivalent of" $100 in 1950 would be much higher today", versus "The equivalence of the two systems was demonstrated through testing".

What's the difference between "equivalent of" and "similar to"?

"Equivalent of" implies a direct correlation or near-equal value, while "similar to" simply suggests a resemblance without implying equality. For example, "This car is the "equivalent of" a luxury model in terms of features", versus "This car is "similar to" a luxury model in design".