equally liable for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equally liable for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or financial contexts to indicate that two or more parties share the same level of responsibility for a particular obligation or debt. Example: "Both partners are equally liable for the debts incurred by the business."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

It makes them equally liable for the killing.

The Guardian

Mr Walsh stressed that the BA operating company would be solely responsible for the deficit, answering "no, no, no," when asked if Iberia shareholders could become equally liable for the deficit once the deal was concluded.

Independent

They have also been charged under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, which holds each accused individual equally liable for all criminal acts committed together as a group.

The New York Times

If, therefore, you find, from the evidence in this case that Fanny and Frances became simultaneously entitled to the possession of this property, they were tenants in common, equally entitled to its benefits, and equally liable for its burdens.

Cornell University

"The minute a couple signs a tax return as 'married joint,' it doesn't matter whose share of the money creates any sort of liability both spouses are equally liable for the full amount even if they are divorced at some point in time," Poulos adds.

Forbes

Furthermore, the contracting client should be held equally liable for contracting with an unregistered PCMF.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

In strict interpretations of Islamic law, or Sharīʿah, men and women are equally liable to harsh punishments for adultery (Arabic: zināʾ; properly, any extramarital sexual intercourse), including death by stoning a punishment still applied in the early 21st century in some countries, including Iran and Afghanistan.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Since trespass is prohibited, persons who breach trespass laws in protest of either those laws or other laws are equally liable to persons who breach trespass laws for private purposes.

SEP

This says the card firm is equally liable with the retailer if things go wrong.

Independent

The hospital, as employer, was held liable for negligence.

Critical Care

In many, although not all, U.S. jurisdictions this different treatment of real estate and personal estate has been abolished, making both liable for claims on an equal footing and equally subject to administration.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equally liable for", ensure that the context clearly defines the specific obligation or debt for which the parties are responsible. Provide details to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "equally liable for" automatically means an equal split of financial burden. Legal agreements may stipulate different contribution percentages even when liability is shared.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equally liable for" functions as an adjectival phrase that modifies a noun, describing the nature of the liability. It indicates a shared responsibility or obligation. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

5%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "equally liable for" is used to denote shared responsibility among multiple parties. Ludwig AI states that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While primarily seen in news and academic contexts, understanding its implications is crucial in legal and business environments. Consider alternative phrases like "jointly responsible for" to refine the nuance of shared liability. Always clarify the specific obligations when using this phrase to avoid misunderstandings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

jointly responsible for

This alternative focuses on the shared nature of the responsibility, emphasizing the cooperative aspect of the liability.

similarly accountable for

This option highlights the parallel nature of the accountability, suggesting that each party is judged by similar standards.

collectively responsible for

Emphasizes the group aspect of the responsibility, suggesting that the liability is shared among a collective.

mutually responsible for

Highlights the reciprocal nature of the responsibility, implying an agreement or understanding of shared liability.

jointly and severally liable for

This legal term specifies that each party is individually liable for the entire debt, as well as jointly liable with other parties.

share the liability for

Focuses on the division of the liability, implying that the burden is distributed among multiple parties.

bear equal responsibility for

Emphasizes the burden of responsibility that each party carries.

answerable together for

Highlights the obligation to provide an explanation or justification together for something.

co-liable for

A more concise way of expressing shared liability, often used in legal or financial contexts.

hold shared responsibility for

Emphasizes the concept of holding or possessing a mutual obligation.

FAQs

How can I use "equally liable for" in a sentence?

You can use "equally liable for" to indicate that two or more parties share the same level of responsibility for a particular obligation. For example, "Both partners are "equally liable for" the debts incurred by the business".

What's a good alternative to "equally liable for"?

Alternatives to "equally liable for" include phrases like "jointly responsible for", "similarly accountable for", or "collectively responsible for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does "jointly and severally liable for" mean compared to "equally liable for"?

"Jointly and severally liable for" means that each party is individually responsible for the entire debt, while "equally liable for" typically implies a shared responsibility, though the exact split may need clarification in legal documents.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "equally liable for"?

The phrase "equally liable for" is appropriate in legal, financial, and business contexts where shared responsibility needs to be clearly established. It is commonly used in contracts, agreements, and legal proceedings.