equally guilty equally

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equally guilty equally" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express that two or more parties share the same level of guilt, but the repetition of "equally" is unnecessary and confusing. Example: "In this case, both parties are equally guilty."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Sawoniuk met this standard, but others who were equally as guilty of mass murder did not.

The Guardian

Actually, it cheapens injustice, leaving everyone equally guilty and equally innocent.

The New York Times - Arts

Sunderland, who was equally guilty, got off.

The Guardian

In reality, the media are equally guilty.

The Guardian

In reality, writes Goldacre, "the media are equally guilty".

The Guardian

Timothy Lee: But if Google is guilty of using Apple's ideas, Apple is equally guilty.

The Guardian - Tech

But you need to start from the position that you're equally guilty.

The New York Times - Magazine

He did not feel that all sides to this conflict were equally guilty.

The New York Times

It follows, therefore, that we are equally guilty of overestimating white-collar productivity.

The New York Times

(Apple and Microsoft are equally guilty of this, to be strictly fair, on Xcode andVisual Studio).

The Guardian - Tech

I am equally guilty of using my children to show off in public.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using repetitive words when trying to emphasize shared guilt or responsibility. Opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "equally culpable" or "jointly responsible".

Common error

Don't repeat "equally" when trying to convey the idea of shared guilt. This creates an awkward and incorrect phrase. Focus on using a single, appropriate adjective to describe the shared responsibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equally guilty equally" is grammatically incorrect and redundant. It attempts to emphasize the equal distribution of guilt but fails due to the unnecessary repetition. Ludwig AI confirms its ungrammatical nature.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equally guilty equally" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the repetition of "equally" is redundant and doesn't add value to the sentence. Instead, opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives such as "equally guilty", "jointly responsible", or "both are to blame". These alternatives effectively convey the intended meaning of shared responsibility or culpability without the grammatical error. Using correct and precise language enhances clarity and credibility in both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equally culpable

Replaces "guilty" with a synonym that also implies responsibility for wrongdoing.

jointly responsible

Indicates a shared responsibility without explicitly stating guilt.

both are to blame

A more direct way of saying that two or more parties share the blame.

share the guilt

Emphasizes the shared nature of the guilt.

complicit in the wrongdoing

Highlights involvement in an unethical or illegal activity.

each bears responsibility

Focuses on the individual responsibility of each party involved.

all are accountable

Emphasizes that everyone involved will be held responsible for their actions.

mutually accountable

Highlights the reciprocal accountability among the involved parties.

collectively liable

Used in legal contexts to indicate that a group is responsible for damages or debts.

in equal measure responsible

Expresses that each party has the same amount of responsibility.

FAQs

How can I express that two parties share the same level of guilt?

Instead of "equally guilty equally", you can say "both are "equally guilty"", "they are "jointly responsible"", or "they "share the blame"".

What's wrong with the phrase "equally guilty equally"?

The phrase "equally guilty equally" is grammatically incorrect because the repetition of "equally" is redundant and doesn't add any meaning. It's better to use a single adverb or adjective to express the shared responsibility.

Is there a formal way to say that multiple parties are responsible for something?

Yes, in formal or legal contexts, you can use phrases like "collectively liable" or "mutually accountable" to indicate shared responsibility.

What are some alternatives to "equally guilty equally" that emphasize individual responsibility?

You can use phrases like "each bears responsibility" or "all are "accountable"", which highlight the individual contribution to the shared guilt or responsibility.