equally bad for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "equally bad for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when comparing two or more things that have something negative in common. For example: Eating too much sugar is bad for your health, but eating too much salt is equally bad for it.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Both are equally bad for your health".

The New York Times - Food

That is equally bad for the lungs, though lighter on the wallet.

The Economist

"Equally, consuming huge volumes in binge episodes is equally bad for you.

Independent

"I feel terrible for the doctor, and I feel equally bad for the people.

The New York Times

"I don't," he replied, "but almost every Chinese person does … Or it's meritocratic only because it's equally bad for everyone".

The Guardian

It is equally bad for mothers, who are forced to assume the role of primary carer, and for the children, who miss out on time with Dad.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

The figures make equally bad reading for all groups disadvantaged in Hollywood.

The Guardian - Film

But what explains the equally bad showing for the French socialists or the Italian democratic party, where Sarkozy and Berlusconi triumphed despite economic meltdown, high unemployment and reactionary politics?

The Guardian - Opinion

At the time, it seemed equally bad luck for a fictional TV character to be born into disrupted schedules the day after Kennedy died, but, 50 years on, the schedules have impressively stretched to accommodate lavish tributes for today's 50th anniversary of JFK's end and tomorrow's marking of five decades since the Doctor's beginning.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Yet it is regarded as equally bad, if not worse, for an individual to indulge in too much marriage, whether in the form of repeated divorces and weddings, or bigamy.

The Guardian - Books

To add insult to injury, many of these same Republican Presidential hopefuls suggest an equally bad set of ideas for Medicare that will give seniors a more expensive and less accessible health care system.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equally bad for", ensure that you are comparing two or more distinct items or actions that have a similar negative impact on something. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "equally bad for" when you are not actually comparing two or more items. If you're only discussing one negative impact, stick to simply stating that something is "bad for" something else, rather than trying to force a comparison that doesn't exist.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equally bad for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate that two or more things have a comparable negative effect. As Ludwig AI explains, it is a correct and usable phrase to compare negative impacts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "equally bad for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to compare the equivalent negative consequences of multiple factors. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase effectively illustrates similar adverse impacts across various subjects. With its prevalence in news, science, and general web content, it maintains a neutral tone suitable for diverse communication contexts. To enhance clarity, always ensure you are explicitly comparing distinct elements. By avoiding its misuse in non-comparative scenarios, you can effectively convey that different factors lead to similarly undesirable outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

just as detrimental to

Emphasizes the harmful aspect with a slightly more formal tone.

similarly harmful to

Highlights the parallel in causing harm.

as damaging to as

Focuses on the destructive effect, maintaining a comparable level of impact.

no better for

Indicates that there is no advantage in choosing one over the other, both being unfavorable.

of equal detriment to

Uses a more formal vocabulary to convey the same negative impact.

comparably negative for

Highlights the comparative aspect, emphasizing the negativity.

uniformly poor for

Implies that the negative outcome is consistently the same across different situations.

equally unfavorable to

Uses a more formal tone to express that both options are not preferred.

as adverse for

Uses a more formal word, replacing "bad" with "adverse", to show negative impact.

detrimental in equal measure to

Emphasizes that the level of harm is equivalent.

FAQs

How can I use "equally bad for" in a sentence?

Use "equally bad for" to compare two or more things that have a similar negative effect on something. For example, "Both smoking and excessive drinking are "equally bad for" your health."

What are some alternatives to "equally bad for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "just as detrimental to", "similarly harmful to", or "as damaging to as". Consider the specific context to choose the most appropriate substitute.

Is it grammatically correct to say "equally bad for"?

Yes, "equally bad for" is grammatically correct. It's a common and acceptable way to compare the negative impact of different things.

What's the difference between "bad for" and "equally bad for"?

"Bad for" simply indicates a negative impact, while ""equally bad for"" indicates that two or more things have a similar level of negative impact. It introduces a comparison.