equality with

USAGE SUMMARY

"equality with" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a comparison or relationship between two or more entities that are considered equal. Example: "The company strives for equality with its competitors in the global market."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Women have absolute equality with men.

Encyclopedia Britannica

John Paul, however, acknowledged equality with nobody.

The Guardian

I've got a kind of equality with other people".

The New Yorker

Because equality with the non-religious isn't Eweida's aim.

The Guardian - Opinion

Manchus, Mongolians, Tibetans and Mohammedans will all enjoy equality with the Chinese.

The New York Times

We move closer to true equality with each woman who leans in.

The New York Times

The whole industry will be under pressure until there is tax equality with supermarkets," he said.

Independent

Aboriginal claims moved from wage equality with Europeans to land rights over territory with Aboriginal associations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Women's football deserves full equality with the men's game, David Beckham has said.

Independent

It was also the physical manifestation of their equality with the newcomers.

The Guardian - Opinion

The first volume, which appeared in 1881, recounts women's earliest attempts to achieve equality with men.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "equality with", ensure that the comparison is clear and the entities being compared are well-defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "equality with" automatically implies identical treatment in all aspects. Specify the specific areas where equality is being sought or achieved.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equality with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying nouns or clauses to specify a state of being equal or equivalent. It indicates a comparative relationship, as seen in Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

18%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "equality with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to denote a balanced or equivalent relationship. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and appropriate for written English. Its prevalence across news, encyclopedias, and scientific literature underscores its broad applicability. While "equality with" is generally neutral in tone, it is crucial to ensure clarity in the comparison and acknowledge that equality in one aspect doesn't necessarily imply identical treatment in all areas. Alternatives like "on par with" or "equal to" can offer nuanced variations in meaning. Finally, using "equality with" can be really useful to emphasize a balanced relationship between different entities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equal to

Directly states equivalence in amount, value, or degree.

equivalent to

Highlights functional or qualitative sameness.

on par with

Emphasizes being at the same level or standard.

comparable to

Suggests a degree of similarity that allows for comparison.

at the same level as

Specifies that something is at the identical hierarchical position.

in line with

Focuses on alignment or conformity to a standard or expectation.

matching with

Implies a perfect correspondence or fit.

uniform with

Stresses consistency and lack of variation.

balanced with

Focuses on achieving equilibrium or proportionality.

consistent with

Highlights coherence and lack of contradiction.

FAQs

How do I use "equality with" in a sentence?

Use "equality with" to show that two or more things are at the same level or status. For example, "The company aims for gender "equality with" men in all departments".

What phrases can I use instead of "equality with"?

Alternatives include "on par with", "equal to", or "equivalent to", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it always appropriate to demand "equality with" another group?

Demanding "equality with" is appropriate when advocating for equal rights, opportunities, or treatment. However, consider the context and ensure that the demand aligns with fairness and justice.

What's the difference between "equality with" and "equity with"?

"Equality with" implies sameness of treatment or status, while "equity with" focuses on fairness and may involve providing different levels of support to ensure equal outcomes.