equal with

USAGE SUMMARY

'equal with' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is generally used to mean that one thing has the same value, quality, or status as something else. For example, "My score on the exam was equal with John's score."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We are all equal, with equally worthwhile problems, ideas, and beliefs.

WikiHow

Caitlin is finally held equal with other great thinkers.

The Guardian

"It would be free and equal, with no occupation.

The New Yorker

"There's a sense of being equal with one another".

The New York Times

Or acknowledging women to be equal with men?

The Economist

In a third, he is equal with Mr Labastida.

The Economist

And for me intuition is equal with statistical calculations.

The Economist

The defeat leaves the Tigers on 18 points, equal with the last-placed Gold Coast.

The Guardian - Sport

"I would rate the annoyance factor to be about equal with hearing my neighbour's leaf blower.

The Guardian

"I always wanted to be equal with the boys," she says.

The Guardian - Music

Gay men now stand very nearly equal with their heterosexual brothers before the law.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision, ensure the context clearly defines the criteria for being "equal with". For instance, specify whether you're referring to quantity, quality, or status.

Common error

Avoid assuming "equal with" implies absolute equality. It often signifies equivalence within specific parameters. Clarify these parameters to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "equal with" functions primarily as a predicate adjective followed by a preposition, describing a state of equivalence or parity between two entities. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

24%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "equal with" is a common and acceptable way to express equivalence or parity, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While often used in news and media, its presence spans across scientific, wiki, and other general contexts. For more formal writing, consider using "equal to", but remember that both options remain grammatically correct. Always ensure that the context clearly defines what aspects are considered equivalent to prevent misinterpretations. When aiming for alternatives, "on par with", "equivalent to", and "the same as" are viable options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equivalent to

Suggests an exact correspondence or functional identity.

the same as

A more general term indicating similarity or equivalence.

on par with

Implies a similar level of quality or achievement; slightly more informal.

comparable to

Highlights similarities and suggests a basis for comparison.

identical to

Emphasizes that two things are exactly alike in all respects.

matching with

Indicates a correspondence or agreement between two things.

commensurate with

Implies that something is in proportion or corresponds in degree.

akin to

Suggests a resemblance or similarity in nature or character.

uniform with

Emphasizes a consistent and unvarying similarity.

tantamount to

Expresses that something is virtually the same as something else, especially in effect or value.

FAQs

How can I use "equal with" in a sentence?

Use "equal with" to indicate that something holds the same value, status, or characteristic as something else. For example, "In terms of higher education, women drew "equal with" men in 1980."

What is a good alternative to "equal with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "on par with", "equivalent to", or "the same as" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it more formal to say "equal to" instead of "equal with"?

Generally, "equal to" is considered slightly more formal than "equal with". Both are acceptable, but "equal to" might be preferred in academic or professional writing.

What's the difference between "equal with" and "associated with"?

"Equal with" indicates equivalence, while "associated with" implies a connection or relationship, not necessarily sameness. They are not interchangeable; use "associated with" when you want to show a correlation rather than equality.