environmental cost

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "environmental cost" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to the costs associated with environmental damage or degradation due to human activities. For example, "The environmental cost of mining for coal is causing concern among local residents."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Then there's the environmental cost.

The New York Times - Travel

Weddings carry a huge environmental cost, too.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But the environmental cost is huge.

The Guardian

That growth comes at an environmental cost.

The Guardian

Unfortunately, though, this has an environmental cost.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

This industrialisation has come at huge environmental cost.

The Guardian

This man-made beauty has an environmental cost.

The Guardian

It came at a huge social and environmental cost.

The Guardian - Opinion

But the environmental cost of coal was clear to him.

The New Yorker

Nor does it cover the environmental cost of fertilizers.

The New York Times

But the environmental cost of expansion would be greater.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the "environmental cost", specify what aspects are being considered (e.g., pollution, resource depletion, habitat loss) for clarity and impact.

Common error

Avoid focusing solely on direct costs (e.g., cleanup expenses) and remember to factor in indirect costs such as long-term health impacts and ecosystem services degradation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "environmental cost" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It names the concept of the expenses or detriments associated with environmental impact. As Ludwig AI explains, it is a valid and usable phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "environmental cost" is a widely used term to describe the negative impacts and expenses associated with environmental damage, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It functions as a noun phrase and appears most frequently in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts. While grammatically correct and very common, remember to specify the aspects of the environmental impact when using it. Consider alternatives such as "ecological price" or "environmental toll" for nuanced expression. By avoiding the common error of overlooking indirect costs, you can ensure a more comprehensive and impactful assessment of the "environmental cost".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ecological price

Replaces "environmental" with "ecological", focusing on the impact on ecosystems.

environmental toll

Uses "toll" to emphasize the negative impact or burden on the environment.

environmental burden

Emphasizes the weight or difficulty caused by environmental damage.

cost to the environment

Rephrases to highlight the environment as the recipient of the cost.

ecological damage expenses

Specifies the cost as expenses related to ecological damage.

price of environmental degradation

Focuses on the "degradation" aspect, highlighting the decline in environmental quality.

economic impact of pollution

Highlights "pollution" as the cause and focuses on the economic consequences.

financial implications for the ecosystem

Focuses on "financial implications" for the "ecosystem", suggesting a broader economic view.

monetary consequence of environmental harm

Highlights the monetary consequence that originates from environmental harm.

expense of environmental protection

Shifts the focus to the expenses incurred for protecting the environment.

FAQs

How can I use "environmental cost" in a sentence?

You can use "environmental cost" to describe the expenses or negative impacts associated with environmental damage. For instance, "The "environmental cost" of deforestation includes habitat loss and increased carbon emissions."

What is a good alternative to "environmental cost"?

Alternatives include "ecological price", "environmental toll", or "cost to the environment", depending on the specific context.

What factors are typically included when calculating the "environmental cost" of a project?

Calculations often include resource depletion, pollution, habitat destruction, and long-term ecological damage. These factors can be difficult to quantify but are essential for a complete assessment.

Is "environmental cost" the same as "economic cost"?

While related, they are not the same. "Economic cost" refers to the financial expenses, while "environmental cost" encompasses the broader impact on ecosystems and natural resources, which may eventually translate into economic consequences.