enough for one channel

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "enough for one channel" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the capacity or sufficiency of resources, content, or information for a single channel, such as a communication channel or media outlet. Example: "The data we collected is enough for one channel, so we can proceed with the analysis for that specific platform."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

It may not be sharp enough for one channel realization with a specific rank value.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

For one channel 10 corresponding pictures were measured.

BMC Veterinary Research

(E ) Example of spike sorting for one channel.

eLife

"It's enough for one day.

The New Yorker

This is improvement enough for one year".

The New Yorker

"A half is enough for one person.

The New York Times

That's enough for one lifetime.

The New York Times

That's enough for one week.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

That was enough for one day.

The New Yorker

That's enough for one night, eh?

The New Yorker

"There was only enough for one".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "enough for one channel", ensure the context clearly defines what 'channel' refers to. Be specific whether it's a communication channel, a media outlet, or a physical channel.

Common error

Avoid assuming the reader understands the type of channel being referenced. Without clear context, "enough for one channel" can be ambiguous. Clarify whether you mean a TV channel, a communication pipeline, or another type of channel.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "enough for one channel" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase. It modifies a noun, indicating that a certain quantity or resource is sufficient or adequate for a single, specified channel. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "enough for one channel" is grammatically correct and usable in written English, indicating that something is sufficient for a single, specified channel. While examples are rare, as pointed out by Ludwig, contexts range from scientific research to media discussions. It is vital to ensure that "channel" is clearly defined within the context to avoid ambiguity. Equivalent alternatives include "sufficient for one channel" or "adequate for a single channel", each offering subtle variations in emphasis. Ludwig AI confirms its usability and grammatical soundness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient for one channel

Replaces "enough" with a synonym indicating adequacy.

adequate for a single channel

Uses "adequate" to convey that the amount is just sufficient.

suitable for one channel

Focuses on appropriateness rather than quantity.

sufficient for use on one channel

Adds clarity by specifying the purpose of the sufficiency.

meets the requirements of one channel

Highlights that the phrase satisfies the criteria for a channel.

fills one channel completely

Emphasizes the idea of fully occupying a channel's capacity.

provides enough for one channel

Shifts the focus to the act of providing what is needed.

is limited to one channel

Indicates a constraint or restriction to a single channel.

exclusively for one channel

Highlights that the channel is the only recipient.

specifically designed for one channel

Emphasizes the purposeful tailoring to a single channel.

FAQs

How can I use "enough for one channel" in a sentence?

You can use "enough for one channel" to describe that a resource or quantity meets the needs or requirements of a single channel. For example, "The budget is "enough for one channel", allowing us to fully fund its programming."

What's the difference between "enough for one channel" and "sufficient for one channel"?

"Enough for one channel" and "sufficient for one channel" are largely interchangeable. "Sufficient" may be considered slightly more formal, but both convey that something meets the minimum requirements for a single channel.

Is "enough for one channel" formal or informal?

"Enough for one channel" is generally considered neutral in tone and can be used in both formal and informal contexts, though it's often found in technical or business discussions.

What are some scenarios where I might use the phrase "enough for one channel"?

You might use "enough for one channel" when discussing bandwidth allocation, marketing campaigns, or resource distribution. For example, "We have "enough for one channel" of distribution, focusing all our efforts on it."