Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

engaged with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "engaged with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe involvement or interaction with a person, idea, or activity. Example: "The students were actively engaged with the material during the lecture."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Have you engaged with technology?

News & Media

The New York Times

Engaged with fish, engaged with life.

Americans are engaged with Presidential politics.

News & Media

The New Yorker

In fact, I felt engaged with democracy".

News & Media

The Economist

We remain engaged with the Leveson inquiry".

News & Media

The Guardian

They're not engaged with anybody else's issues".

News & Media

The Guardian

He was hugely engaged with European politics.

They are engaged with the problem.

News & Media

The Guardian

"I'm engaged with a more total realism".

News & Media

The New Yorker

Would we have engaged with the police?

News & Media

The Guardian

She got engaged with people's lives.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "engaged with" to describe active participation or meaningful interaction, rather than passive observation. For example, "The students were actively engaged with the discussion" is more impactful than "The students were present during the discussion."

Common error

Avoid using "engaged with" when a simpler verb like "used", "read", or "watched" would be more precise and direct. For example, instead of "He engaged with the article", consider "He read the article."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "engaged with" typically functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating a state of being involved or actively participating in something. Ludwig examples show its use in describing interaction with technology, politics, and even personal relationships. The Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "engaged with" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to express active involvement or interaction. It appears frequently in news, science, and business contexts, implying a level of formality and considered participation. Ludwig confirms its correctness, making it a reliable choice for describing active engagement. When writing, remember to use it in contexts where active participation is intended and avoid overuse when a simpler verb would suffice. Consider alternatives like ""involved in"" or ""participated in"" to fine-tune the nuance of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "engaged with" in a sentence?

Use "engaged with" to describe active participation or interaction with something. For example: "The community was actively "involved with" the project". Alternatives include "participated in" or "connected with".

What are some alternatives to saying "engaged with"?

Depending on the context, you can replace "engaged with" with phrases like "involved in", "interacted with", "participated in", or "connected with".

Which is correct, "engaged with" or "engaging with"?

"Engaged with" is typically used to describe a past or present state of involvement, while "engaging with" describes the act of becoming involved or interacting. For example, "She is now "interacting with" the new software" (engaging) versus "She was fully "involved with" the project" (engaged).

What's the difference between "engaged with" and "involved with"?

While both imply participation, "engaged with" often suggests a more active and dynamic interaction, while "involved with" can indicate a broader or more general association. If I'm ""involved with"" politics, it can mean anything from donating money to attending rallies. If I'm "engaged with" politics, I'm actively debating, protesting, or campaigning.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: