Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
empty of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"empty of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is often used to refer to something that is absent or lacking in something else, or has been emptied or voided of something. For example: "The room was empty of furniture."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(9)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
It was empty — of students.
News & Media
Be empty of worrying".
News & Media
The roads themselves were empty of traffic.
News & Media
And my mind was empty of thoughts.
News & Media
So our bloodcup runs empty of urge.
News & Media
He is empty of humanity.
News & Media
The beach was also empty of anglers.
News & Media
Empty of course because it wasn't open.
News & Media
The supermarket shelves were empty of eyewash.
News & Media
"The local shops are empty of bicycles.
News & Media
The floor is still empty of employees.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "empty of" to clearly indicate the absence of something specific, ensuring your sentence highlights what is lacking rather than just describing a general void.
Common error
Avoid using "empty of" in overly complex sentences where simpler alternatives like "lacking" or "without" would improve clarity and readability.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "empty of" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a state of lacking or absence. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
65%
Science
20%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Wiki
2%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "empty of" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase that indicates a lack or absence of something. Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples shows its prevalence in News & Media, Science, and other contexts. While versatile, simpler alternatives like "lacking" or "without" may sometimes be preferred for improved clarity. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is suitable for various writing situations, although considering the tone and audience is always important. Related phrases like "devoid of" and "lacking in" can provide stylistic variation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
devoid of
This alternative suggests a complete absence, similar to "empty of".
absent of
Directly states the non-existence or lack of something, mirroring "empty of".
vacant of
Describes a state of being unoccupied or "empty of" inhabitants or contents.
lacking in
Indicates a deficiency or shortage, similar to being "empty of" something.
without
A more general term for absence, but can often replace "empty of".
missing
Simply indicates that something is not present, thus the space is "empty of" that thing.
bereft of
Suggests a loss or deprivation, implying something was once present but is now "empty of".
free from
Implies an absence of something undesirable, similar to being "empty of" negative qualities.
clear of
Indicates that something has been completely removed, leaving it "empty of" its contents.
exhausted of
Signifies that something has been completely used up, leaving it "empty of" its resource.
FAQs
How can I use "empty of" in a sentence?
You can use "empty of" to describe something that lacks a particular element. For example, "The room was "empty of" furniture" indicates the absence of furniture in the room.
What's a good alternative to "empty of"?
Alternatives include "devoid of", "lacking in", or "without depending on the context".
Is it always appropriate to use "empty of" in formal writing?
While grammatically correct, "empty of" can sometimes sound slightly less formal than alternatives like "devoid of" or "lacking in". Consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing.
Which is more correct, "empty of" or "empty from"?
"Empty of" is the correct and more commonly used phrase. "Empty from" is not standard English.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested