embraced the expense

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "embraced the expense" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a willingness to accept or take on a financial cost or burden. Example: "Despite the high costs, the company embraced the expense in order to improve its infrastructure."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The bank embraced the expense as a pathway to closing a dark chapter in its history.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Vice President Al Gore assailed Gov. George W. Bush of Texas today as a man who has embraced the interests of corporations at the expense of the middle class.

The New York Times

Kenyans embraced the change.

The Economist

Mr. Mack embraced the analogy.

The New York Times

They've embraced the hypnotic.

The New York Times - Arts

So I embraced the tiger.

The New Yorker

The family embraced the neighborhood.

The New York Times

Mr. Daley embraced the project.

The New York Times - Science

D'Antoni embraced the notion cautiously.

The New York Times - Sports

Child embraced the role.

Los Angeles Times

Some clearly embraced the practice.

Chiropractic and Manual Therapies

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "embraced the expense" when you want to highlight a proactive or positive acceptance of a cost, often implying it's seen as an investment or necessary step rather than a mere obligation.

Common error

Don't use "embraced the expense" if the context suggests reluctance or suffering due to the cost. Opt for phrases like "endured the cost" or "bore the expense" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "embraced the expense" functions as a verb phrase where "embraced" acts as the main verb indicating acceptance, and "the expense" serves as the direct object, specifying what is being accepted. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "embraced the expense" denotes a deliberate and often positive acceptance of a cost or expenditure. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and usability. Although not highly frequent, it appears primarily in news and media contexts. Alternatives like "accepted the cost" or "took on the burden" offer similar meanings with slightly different connotations. When employing this phrase, ensure the context supports a proactive and strategic acceptance of the cost, as opposed to mere reluctant compliance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accepted the cost

Replaces "embraced" with a more neutral term, indicating agreement rather than enthusiastic acceptance.

took on the burden

Shifts focus from financial cost to the weight of the responsibility.

willingly paid for it

Emphasizes the willingness to make the payment.

shouldered the expense

Implies bearing the cost, often with resilience.

absorbed the cost

Focuses on the act of fully taking in the financial implications.

accommodated the outlay

Highlights making adjustments to incorporate the spending.

bore the financial strain

Emphasizes enduring the difficulty related to money.

underwent the expenditure

Suggests going through a process that necessitates spending.

digested the charge

Implies a slow understanding and incorporation of a given monetary cost.

consented to the fee

Signifies providing permission to pay.

FAQs

How can I use "embraced the expense" in a sentence?

You can use "embraced the expense" to describe a situation where someone willingly accepted a cost for a perceived benefit. For example: "The company "embraced the expense" of new equipment to improve productivity".

What are some alternatives to "embraced the expense"?

Alternatives include "accepted the cost", "took on the burden", or "willingly paid for it", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "embraced the expense"?

It's appropriate when the acceptance of the cost is seen as a positive or strategic decision, not simply an unavoidable burden. It suggests a proactive and often enthusiastic approach to the spending.

Is "embraced the expense" formal or informal language?

"Embraced the expense" falls into the neutral to slightly formal register. It is not overly technical but carries a more deliberate tone than simple acceptance.