Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

eliminated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "eliminated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the removal or eradication of something in conjunction with another element or method. Example: "The errors in the report were eliminated with careful proofreading and editing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mohair price supports were eliminated with great fanfare and effort.

News & Media

The New York Times

Serial bottlenecks are eliminated with no additional memory usage.

Six acts will be eliminated with those remaining going through.

News & Media

Independent

The artifact was completely eliminated with a 100-Hz low-pass filter.

His form was off, and he was effectively eliminated with a low score of 49.50.

The creased look of the old scenery in the beginning could be eliminated with better lighting.

Company contributions to retirement plans would be eliminated, with limited exceptions for older employees.

News & Media

The New York Times

He concluded that the "risk can be eliminated" with air-conditioning and other precautions.

News & Media

The New York Times

Approximately 25% of food waste in the developing world could be eliminated with better refrigeration equipment.

News & Media

The Guardian

Instead both have been eliminated, with unfancied England and New Zealand progressing.

About seventy-six hundred wereeliminatedeliminated with the help of Nunn-Lugar.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "eliminated with", ensure that the method or tool used for elimination is clearly specified to provide context and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "eliminated with" without specifying what exactly caused the elimination. For instance, instead of "The problem was eliminated with a solution", specify "The problem was eliminated with a carefully formulated algorithm."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "eliminated with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that something has been removed or eradicated through a specific means or agent. Ludwig examples show it connecting a result (elimination) to a cause or method.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

41%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Academia

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "eliminated with" is a versatile phrase used to describe the removal or eradication of something through a specific method or agent. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used in various contexts, including science, news, and general writing. To use it effectively, ensure you clearly specify the agent or method that facilitates the elimination. While alternatives like "removed by" or "eradicated by means of" exist, "eliminated with" effectively conveys the instrumental aspect of the action.

FAQs

How can I use "eliminated with" in a sentence?

Use "eliminated with" to show that something was removed or eradicated by a specific action or method. For example, "The errors were "corrected with" careful proofreading."

What are some alternatives to "eliminated with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "removed by", "eradicated by means of", or "resolved through", each emphasizing different aspects of removal.

Is it better to say "eliminated by" or "eliminated with"?

Both are correct, but "eliminated with" emphasizes the tool, method, or agent used in the elimination process. "Eliminated by" simply indicates the cause of elimination. Choose the phrasing that best fits the context.

Which is correct, "eliminated with" or "eliminated using"?

"Eliminated with" and "eliminated using" are both grammatically correct and largely interchangeable. "Eliminated with" might imply a closer, more direct involvement of the agent in the process.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: