eligible for removal

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "eligible for removal" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where something or someone qualifies to be taken away or eliminated, such as in legal, administrative, or organizational settings. Example: "Due to the recent policy changes, several employees are now eligible for removal from the project team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Wiki

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

Using a systematic backward elimination approach, non-significant variables were removed from the model until no further variables were eligible for removal to arrive at the final parsimonious model.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Clearly identify each entry on your report that you want removed, and state the reason why the information is eligible for removal.

WikiHow

To be eligible for removal, it must raise its overall test scores from 7 percent meeting standards to 10 percent.

The New York Times

Variables were eligible for removal at p ≥0.05.

BMC Infectious Diseases

We regarded the top 10 questions to be the most important questions in the questionnaire and the bottom 10 questions to be eligible for removal from the questionnaire.

BMC Cancer

For all models, the test of a term's significance was the likelihood-ratio test; variables with p < 0.05 were eligible for addition to the model and p ≥ 0.05 were eligible for removal.

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

A 2012 report by the Vera Institute of Justice found that 40percentt of migrant children in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) were potentially eligible for relief from removal, including for political asylum, special immigrant juvenile visas for abandoned, abused and neglected children, and non-immigrant visas for victims of human trafficking and survivors of crime.

Huffington Post

Despite the fact that the government has conceded that he is eligible for relief from removal, the government has detained him for over a year, without providing him with a bond hearing and without appointing a qualified legal representative who can argue for his release.

Huffington Post

The method terminated when no more variables were eligible for inclusion or removal.

Clinical interventions in aging

Long-term or lifelong suppressive antimicrobial therapy in patients who are not eligible for surgical device removal has been reported [ 28, 29] with partial success.

BMC Infectious Diseases

The organochlorine variables were then entered stepwise into the model, sequentially, in order of the smallest probability of F (if F ≤ 0.10), until no more variables were eligible for inclusion or removal (F ≥ 0.15).

Environmental Health Perspectives

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "eligible for removal", ensure that the criteria for eligibility have been clearly defined and are understood by all parties involved.

Common error

Avoid assuming something is "eligible for removal" without a formal review process or documented evidence that it meets the specified requirements. Always verify against the official guidelines.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "eligible for removal" functions as an adjective phrase describing a noun (explicit or implicit) that meets the necessary conditions to be taken away or eliminated. As Ludwig AI underlines, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

Wiki

30%

News & Media

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "eligible for removal" is a grammatically sound way to express that something or someone meets the criteria to be removed, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It is most frequently found in scientific, wiki, and news contexts, indicating a formal or neutral tone. When using this phrase, ensure the eligibility criteria are clearly defined. Consider alternatives like "qualified for elimination" or "suitable for exclusion" for nuanced meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

qualified for elimination

Focuses on meeting specific criteria to be eliminated.

suitable for exclusion

Highlights appropriateness for being excluded based on certain standards.

meets removal criteria

Specifically points to satisfying established requirements for removal.

subject to being discarded

Emphasizes the potential for being discarded based on current status.

liable to be withdrawn

Implies a responsibility or likelihood of being withdrawn.

open to deletion

Highlights the possibility and acceptance of deletion.

cleared for termination

Indicates that all necessary approvals for termination have been obtained.

approved for discharge

Specifies formal approval for being discharged or released.

ready for decommissioning

Highlights the readiness for the process of decommissioning or taking out of service.

available for extraction

Focuses on the availability and suitability for being extracted or taken out.

FAQs

How can I use "eligible for removal" in a sentence?

You can use "eligible for removal" to indicate that something or someone meets the requirements to be taken away or eliminated. For example, "Items not meeting the quality standards are "eligible for removal" from the inventory".

What are some alternatives to "eligible for removal"?

Some alternatives to "eligible for removal" include "qualified for elimination", "suitable for exclusion", or "meets removal criteria" depending on the context.

What makes something "eligible for removal"?

Eligibility for removal depends on specific criteria established by policies, rules, or guidelines. These criteria might include not meeting performance standards, violating regulations, or being obsolete.

Which is correct, "eligible for removal" or "eligible to remove"?

"Eligible for removal" is the correct phrasing. "Eligible to remove" implies that something is allowed to do the act of removing, rather than being the recipient of the action. For example, an employee is not "eligible to remove", but a defective product is "eligible for removal".