Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

eligible for inclusion

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "eligible for inclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone or something that meets the criteria to be included in a group, list, or selection. Example: "All applicants who meet the qualifications are eligible for inclusion in the final selection process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A combined company could be eligible for inclusion in the FTSE 100.

Eighteen studies were eligible for inclusion.

Ninety-nine patients were eligible for inclusion.

All study designs were eligible for inclusion.

126 Patients were eligible for inclusion.

Six studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis.

After screening, 232 articles were eligible for inclusion.

Seventeen studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 162 patients were eligible for inclusion.

Results:Sixteen studies were identified as eligible for inclusion.

In total, 206 caregivers were eligible for inclusion.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific papers or reports, use "eligible for inclusion" to clearly define which data sets or participants meet the pre-defined criteria for your study. This ensures transparency and replicability.

Common error

Avoid making your inclusion criteria too broad when using the phrase "eligible for inclusion". Vague or excessively inclusive criteria can lead to biased results or skewed data. Define specific and measurable criteria to maintain the integrity of your analysis.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "eligible for inclusion" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that something meets the criteria to be considered part of a specific group or selection. As per Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

87%

News & Media

7%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "eligible for inclusion" is a grammatically sound and frequently used term, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's the go-to phrase when you want to convey that something meets specific criteria for being included in a group or study. Remember to set clear and measurable criteria when determining who or what is "eligible for inclusion" to maintain rigor and avoid bias. For alternative phrasing, consider "qualified for inclusion" or "suitable for inclusion", depending on the nuances you want to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "eligible for inclusion" in a sentence?

You can use "eligible for inclusion" to describe something that meets the necessary criteria to be included in a study, list, or group. For example, "Only participants who meet the age requirement are "eligible for inclusion" in the study".

What are some alternatives to "eligible for inclusion"?

Alternatives include "qualified for inclusion", "suitable for inclusion", or "acceptable for inclusion" depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "eligible for inclusion" and "selected for inclusion"?

"Eligible for inclusion" means that something meets the minimum requirements to be considered, while "selected for inclusion" means that it has been chosen from among those that are eligible.

Is it better to say "eligible to be included" or "eligible for inclusion"?

"Eligible for inclusion" is generally preferred because it is more concise and idiomatic. "Eligible to be included" is grammatically correct, but sounds less natural. The version "eligible for inclusion" is more common.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: