Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
eligible for inclusion
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "eligible for inclusion" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone or something that meets the criteria to be included in a group, list, or selection. Example: "All applicants who meet the qualifications are eligible for inclusion in the final selection process."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A combined company could be eligible for inclusion in the FTSE 100.
News & Media
Eighteen studies were eligible for inclusion.
Science
Ninety-nine patients were eligible for inclusion.
All study designs were eligible for inclusion.
Science
126 Patients were eligible for inclusion.
Six studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
After screening, 232 articles were eligible for inclusion.
Seventeen studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis.
Science
Results: A total of 162 patients were eligible for inclusion.
Science
Results:Sixteen studies were identified as eligible for inclusion.
In total, 206 caregivers were eligible for inclusion.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing scientific papers or reports, use "eligible for inclusion" to clearly define which data sets or participants meet the pre-defined criteria for your study. This ensures transparency and replicability.
Common error
Avoid making your inclusion criteria too broad when using the phrase "eligible for inclusion". Vague or excessively inclusive criteria can lead to biased results or skewed data. Define specific and measurable criteria to maintain the integrity of your analysis.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "eligible for inclusion" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun, indicating that something meets the criteria to be considered part of a specific group or selection. As per Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
87%
News & Media
7%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "eligible for inclusion" is a grammatically sound and frequently used term, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's the go-to phrase when you want to convey that something meets specific criteria for being included in a group or study. Remember to set clear and measurable criteria when determining who or what is "eligible for inclusion" to maintain rigor and avoid bias. For alternative phrasing, consider "qualified for inclusion" or "suitable for inclusion", depending on the nuances you want to convey.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
qualified for inclusion
This alternative emphasizes that specific qualifications or requirements have been met.
suitable for inclusion
This alternative highlights the appropriateness or fitness for being included.
acceptable for inclusion
This focuses on meeting the minimum standards to be considered for inclusion.
appropriate for inclusion
Similar to 'suitable', this highlights the relevance of something for inclusion.
meeting inclusion criteria
This alternative emphasizes the act of satisfying specific criteria for inclusion.
meeting the requirements for inclusion
Focuses specifically on fulfilling mandatory requirements.
considered for inclusion
Suggests that something is under consideration but not yet definitively included.
candidates for inclusion
Positions the subjects as potential options to be included.
in contention for inclusion
This implies that there is competition or a selection process for inclusion.
potentially includable
Highlights the possibility of being included, depending on further assessment.
FAQs
How can I use "eligible for inclusion" in a sentence?
You can use "eligible for inclusion" to describe something that meets the necessary criteria to be included in a study, list, or group. For example, "Only participants who meet the age requirement are "eligible for inclusion" in the study".
What are some alternatives to "eligible for inclusion"?
Alternatives include "qualified for inclusion", "suitable for inclusion", or "acceptable for inclusion" depending on the specific context.
What is the difference between "eligible for inclusion" and "selected for inclusion"?
"Eligible for inclusion" means that something meets the minimum requirements to be considered, while "selected for inclusion" means that it has been chosen from among those that are eligible.
Is it better to say "eligible to be included" or "eligible for inclusion"?
"Eligible for inclusion" is generally preferred because it is more concise and idiomatic. "Eligible to be included" is grammatically correct, but sounds less natural. The version "eligible for inclusion" is more common.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested