egregiously negative

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "egregiously negative" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is extremely or shockingly negative in nature, often in a critical context. Example: "The review was egregiously negative, highlighting numerous flaws in the product that were hard to overlook."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In terms of changing facts on the ground, or substantively altering the egregiously negative Syrian dynamic, it may have scant impact.

The Guardian

Our own inner dialogue is often fraught with egregiously negative self-judgment.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

It's not the only one – there's many, many cases that were egregious, egregiously done.

Los Angeles Times

"Egregiously poor".

The New York Times

But his character still feels egregiously idealized.

The New York Times

Clearly I wasn't egregiously responsible.

The New York Times

Which writers are egregiously overlooked or underrated?

The New York Times - Books

"This is so egregiously out of character.

The New York Times

To most foreigners, its faux-diamond ornamentation is egregiously kitschy.

The Economist

"They can violate your constitutional rights — reasonably but not egregiously".

The New Yorker

It is no surprise that they are egregiously inefficient.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "egregiously negative", ensure the context provides clear evidence of the extreme and shocking nature of the negativity you are describing. Avoid overusing the phrase; use it when the situation genuinely warrants such strong language.

Common error

Avoid using "egregiously negative" for mildly negative situations. The phrase implies an extreme level of negativity, so using it in less severe contexts can weaken your writing and make it sound hyperbolic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "egregiously negative" functions as an adverb-adjective combination that modifies a noun. The adverb "egregiously" intensifies the adjective "negative", creating a stronger expression of disapproval or criticism. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage for emphasizing strong negativity.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "egregiously negative" is a valid phrase used to describe something that is shockingly and extremely negative. Ludwig AI confirms that it is more than just negative, implying moral disapproval. While grammatically correct, its intensity means it should be used judiciously and kept in context. More common alternatives include "blatantly unfavorable" and "grossly unfavorable". The phrase is most often found in News & Media sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

blatantly unfavorable

Replaces "egregiously" with "blatantly", indicating an obvious and unconcealed negativity.

patently adverse

Substitutes "egregiously" with "patently", which means obviously or clearly, and "negative" with "adverse", indicating harm or opposition.

flagrantly detrimental

Replaces "egregiously" with "flagrantly", implying a shocking or conspicuously bad negativity, and "negative" with "detrimental", highlighting harm.

grossly unfavorable

Uses "grossly" instead of "egregiously" to intensify the negative aspect, suggesting a large or extreme degree of unfavorability.

outrageously detrimental

Emphasizes the negativity through "outrageously", indicating that the negative impact is shocking or offensive, and uses "detrimental" to indicate harm.

terribly adverse

Replaces "egregiously" with "terribly", indicating a severe degree of negativity or harm.

shockingly bad

Simplifies the wording to emphasize the surprise and intensity of the negativity.

appallingly poor

Uses "appallingly" to highlight the negativity as something that causes dismay or horror, and "poor" to denote low quality.

scandalously harmful

Replaces "egregiously negative" with "scandalously harmful", suggesting the negativity has a scandalous and damaging quality.

disgracefully awful

Emphasizes the negativity as shameful and very bad.

FAQs

How can I use "egregiously negative" in a sentence?

You can use "egregiously negative" to describe situations, reviews, or outcomes that are shockingly or extremely negative. For example, "The review was "egregiously negative", highlighting numerous flaws."

What are some alternatives to "egregiously negative"?

Some alternatives include "blatantly unfavorable", "patently adverse", or "grossly unfavorable". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "very egregiously negative"?

Yes, it is redundant. The word "egregiously" already implies a very high degree of negativity, so adding "very" is unnecessary. Simply use "egregiously negative".

What is the difference between "extremely negative" and "egregiously negative"?

"Extremely negative" indicates a high degree of negativity, while "egregiously negative" suggests the negativity is not only high but also shockingly or conspicuously bad. "Egregiously" adds a layer of moral disapproval or outrage.