egregious harm

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "egregious harm" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant or shocking level of damage or injury caused to someone or something. Example: "The company's negligence resulted in egregious harm to the environment, leading to widespread public outrage."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Rosenstein may have genuinely believed that he was correcting an egregious harm to the Justice Department committed by Comey, one that still offended many lawyers there.

The New Yorker

"Shouldn't LASA, as an organization of academics, be even more concerned about subsidizing the participation of someone who has done egregious harm to the core principles it represents?" Mr. Vivanco asked.

The New York Times

Last night he moved beyond accountability and offered a sensible solution to a problem that was incomprehensibly exacerbated by the choices and inactions of government officials who, instead of taking care of our citizens, caused them egregious harm.

Huffington Post

While the nation pays close attention to the Senate's health care bill this week, the U.S. House of Representatives intends to do more egregious harm to everyday people who encounter the health care system.

Huffington Post

My legislation is really about beginning to repair the egregious harm that has been done to the communities that have been targeted… Nobody is setting up FBI sting operations or stopping and frisking people as they come home from a fraternity party.

Vice

The main objective of institutional ethics committees is the protection of research participants in Nigeria from egregious harm by enforcing compliance with the ethical guidelines in the Code, the clinical trial agreement and material transfer agreement (see below under CTA and MTA).

BMC Medical Ethics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

In the past, such tribunals have interpreted the requirement that foreign investors receive "fair and equitable treatment" as grounds for striking down new government regulations – even if they are non-discriminatory and are adopted simply to protect citizens from newly discovered egregious harms.

The Guardian - Business

As we look to persuade the public and the legislature to act upon the urgency we feel to transform the system, I refer to reports of some of the most egregious harms inflicted upon youth in the custody of the juvenile justice system.

Huffington Post

"There may be circumstances where conduct is so egregious, and harm so great, that no amount of cooperation or other mitigating conduct can justify a decision not to bring any enforcement action," the commission said.

The New York Times

"In this case, the level and degree of egregious behaviour and harm to the Navajo nation factored heavily into the Navajo nation's decision to act," he said.

The Guardian

The S.E.C. memo cites three criteria: "misconduct that harmed large numbers of investors or placed investors or the market at risk of potentially serious harm"; "egregious intentional misconduct"; or "when the defendant engaged in unlawful obstruction of the commission's investigative processes".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "egregious harm", ensure the context clearly establishes the act as shockingly bad or outstandingly terrible. Reserve it for situations where the severity is undeniable.

Common error

Avoid using "egregious harm" in situations where the harm is relatively minor or subjective. Overusing strong language can diminish its impact when you need it most.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "egregious harm" functions as a noun phrase, where "egregious" is an adjective modifying the noun "harm". It describes the extent and severity of the harm. Ludwig AI confirms its usability.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "egregious harm" is a valid and usable English expression that describes a shockingly bad or conspicuously terrible level of damage or injury. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While relatively uncommon, it appears most frequently in news and media contexts and scientific publications, indicating a neutral formality level. When using this phrase, ensure the context justifies the strong emphasis on severity. Alternatives such as "severe damage" or "outrageous injury" may be more appropriate in less extreme cases. The examples provided by Ludwig illustrate the phrase's use in various situations where the harm is undeniably severe and unacceptable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

severe damage

Focuses on the extent of the damage rather than the moral reprehensibility.

outrageous injury

Emphasizes the shocking and unacceptable nature of the injury.

flagrant abuse

Highlights the blatant and offensive misuse of power or authority.

gross injustice

Focuses on the unfairness and severity of the injustice.

grievous wrong

Emphasizes the deep and profound nature of the wrong committed.

heinous act

Highlights the shocking and wicked nature of the act.

appalling misconduct

Focuses on the unacceptable and shocking nature of the behavior.

terrible disservice

Highlights the negative impact and the betrayal of trust.

substantial detriment

Focuses on the significant negative impact or loss.

unconscionable damage

Emphasizes that the damage is so excessive and immoral that it is shockingly unfair and unjust.

FAQs

How to use "egregious harm" in a sentence?

Use "egregious harm" to describe situations where the damage or wrongdoing is shockingly bad or obviously terrible. For example: "The defendant's actions caused "egregious harm" to the victims."

What can I say instead of "egregious harm"?

You can use alternatives like "severe damage", "outrageous injury", or "flagrant abuse" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "egregious harm" or "egregious damage"?

Both ""egregious harm"" and "egregious damage" can be correct, but ""egregious harm"" often implies a more direct and personal impact, while "egregious damage" may refer to physical or material damage.

What's the difference between "egregious harm" and "serious harm"?

"Egregious harm" implies that the harm is not only serious but also shockingly bad or conspicuously offensive, while "serious harm" simply indicates that the harm is significant.