easy to recognize

USAGE SUMMARY

'easy to recognize' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when something is easy for someone to identify or remember. For example, "The company logo is easy to recognize."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The front is not easy to recognize.

The New Yorker

He was easy to recognize.

The New York Times - Travel

Rockwell's paintings are easy to recognize.

The New York Times - Arts

It is easy to recognize me".

The New Yorker

IT'S easy to recognize the Bad Girl.

The New York Times

Rebels are easy to recognize.

Harvard Business Review

What made him easy to recognize?

The New York Times

"It's not easy to recognize your past.

The Washington Post

This distinction makes fossilized primate teeth easy to recognize.

Encyclopedia Britannica

IT'S not easy to recognize speakers solely by their voices.

The New York Times - Tech

To most outsiders, Mexican art is easy to recognize.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "easy to recognize" to describe features or attributes that allow for quick and effortless identification. For example, "The landmark's unique architecture made it easy to recognize from a distance."

Common error

Avoid using "easy to recognize" when describing subtle or nuanced distinctions that require expert knowledge. Instead, opt for phrases that acknowledge the complexity of identification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "easy to recognize" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe something that is readily identifiable. Ludwig shows that it's used to describe objects, people, and abstract concepts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

25%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "easy to recognize" is a common and grammatically correct adjectival phrase used to describe something readily identifiable. According to Ludwig, this phrase appears most frequently in News & Media, Science and Academia. To enhance clarity, consider alternatives such as "readily identifiable" or "simple to spot", depending on the context. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability for general use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

readily identifiable

This alternative uses a more formal tone and emphasizes the inherent visibility of something.

clearly discernible

This alternative is more formal and emphasizes the ability to perceive something distinctly.

unmistakable

This alternative suggests that something cannot be confused with anything else.

simple to spot

This alternative is more informal and focuses on the act of noticing something quickly.

hard to miss

This alternative emphasizes the difficulty of overlooking or failing to notice something.

distinct

This alternative highlights the unique characteristics that make something stand out.

plain to see

This alternative is an informal idiom meaning obvious or easily understood.

noticeable

This alternative simply means something attracts attention.

evident

This alternative implies that something is obvious and requires no proof.

patent

This alternative suggests something obvious or easily perceived.

FAQs

How can I use "easy to recognize" in a sentence?

You can use "easy to recognize" to describe something with distinct or obvious features. For example, "The bird's bright plumage made it "easy to recognize"."

What's a simpler way to say "easy to recognize"?

Alternatives include "simple to spot", "readily identifiable", or "unmistakable", depending on the context.

Is there a difference between "easy to recognize" and "easy to identify"?

While similar, "easy to recognize" implies familiarity or previous knowledge, whereas "easy to identify" focuses on the act of distinguishing something from others. You recognize something you've seen before; you identify something based on its characteristics.

When should I avoid using "easy to recognize"?

Avoid using "easy to recognize" when the identification requires specialized knowledge or careful examination. In such cases, phrases like "requires careful analysis" or "needs expert evaluation" may be more appropriate.