easy to hear

USAGE SUMMARY

"easy to hear" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something can be heard clearly. For example, "The birdsong was easy to hear in the still morning air."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Arts

General

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It's easy to hear why.

The Times

It's not always easy to hear the faint and unseen.

The New York Times

The text, in Andrew Porter's translation, was easy to hear.

The Guardian - Music

It was very easy to hear the chanting.

The Guardian - Sport

Their influences are easy to hear: Talking Heads, Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk.

The New York Times - Arts

It is easy to hear why Rubin scrapped it and why Ritchie brought it back.

The New Yorker

It's easy to hear the excitement in his voice when he speaks of it.

The New York Times

This truth isn't always easy to hear, especially when it requires action.

The Washington Post

Except, alas, that — even amplified — the child actors aren't easy to hear.

The New York Times

Burton seemed to be enjoying himself, but it was not easy to hear him.

The Guardian - Books

This is not easy stuff to go through; it is not easy to hear about.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing sound quality in writing, use "easy to hear" to indicate clarity and lack of obstruction. This phrase is suitable for both technical and creative writing.

Common error

Avoid overusing "easy to hear" in contexts where more descriptive terms would be appropriate. For instance, instead of saying "the music was easy to hear", consider specifying what made it clear, such as "the music was crisp and clear", providing a more vivid auditory experience for the reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "easy to hear" functions as an adjective phrase modifying an implied noun (something). It describes the audibility or clarity of a sound. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Arts

20%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Science

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "easy to hear" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe sounds that are readily audible and clear. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, arts, and general writing. When you want to convey that a sound is distinct and requires little effort to perceive, "easy to hear" is a suitable choice. However, be mindful of the context and consider more descriptive alternatives when greater detail is needed. While highly versatile, overuse in contexts demanding technical precision should be avoided.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

not difficult to hear

Expresses the same idea by negating the difficulty of hearing.

can be easily heard

Changes the structure to a passive voice, emphasizing the possibility of hearing something easily.

clearly audible

Focuses on the clarity of the sound rather than the effort required to hear it.

effortlessly heard

Focuses on the lack of effort required to hear something.

readily audible

Emphasizes the ease and quickness with which something can be heard.

plainly audible

Emphasizes the obviousness of the sound.

distinctly heard

Highlights the sharpness and clarity of the sound being heard.

simple to hear

Emphasizes the uncomplicated nature of the act of hearing.

audible without difficulty

A more formal way of saying "easy to hear", stressing the lack of any impediment to hearing.

easily perceived aurally

Uses more technical language to describe the ease of auditory perception.

FAQs

How can I use "easy to hear" in a sentence?

Use "easy to hear" to describe sounds that are clear and distinct. For example, "The speaker's voice was "easy to hear", even from the back of the room".

What are some alternatives to "easy to hear"?

You can use alternatives such as "clearly audible", "readily audible", or "distinctly heard" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "easy to hear" or "easily heard"?

Both ""easy to hear"" and "easily heard" are grammatically correct. "Easy to hear" often emphasizes the quality of the sound itself, while "easily heard" focuses on the act of hearing.

When should I avoid using "easy to hear"?

Avoid using "easy to hear" when you need to provide more specific details about the sound's characteristics. Instead, describe the sound's clarity, volume, or other qualities to give a richer description.