earmarked for demolition

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "earmarked for demolition" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a building or structure that has been designated or planned to be demolished. Example: "The old factory has been earmarked for demolition to make way for a new shopping center."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

PRESTON bus station was earmarked for demolition in 1999.

The Economist

By the 1960s, the building was an empty white elephant; earmarked for demolition.

Independent

Some 550 houses have been earmarked for demolition to make way for the new barriers.

Independent

Six other churches or their adjoining buildings were earmarked for demolition in Wenzhou in May.

The Guardian

The complex has been earmarked for demolition as part of a larger regeneration project called Blackwall Reach.

Independent

"These properties have long been earmarked for demolition and Annington advised tenants of this back in 2012.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

The demolition of thousands of wooden shacks in the area earmarked for development forced residents – among them forced Korean labourers and members of the burakumin underclass – to relocate to the banks of the Ota River.

The Guardian

The fuel tax is earmarked for highways.

The Economist

Money for the future, earmarked for surgery.

The New Yorker

The rest is earmarked for compensating investors.

The Economist

Half the money was earmarked for Medicaid.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "earmarked for demolition", ensure the subject is a physical structure (building, bridge, etc.). It's not typically used for abstract concepts.

Common error

Avoid using "earmarked for demolition" with abstract nouns. Instead of saying "the project was earmarked for demolition", which is incorrect, consider "the project was "abandoned"" or "the project was "cancelled"".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "earmarked for demolition" functions as a participial adjective phrase modifying a noun. It indicates that the noun (usually a building or structure) has been designated for future destruction. As Ludwig AI explains, this usage is correct and common.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

94%

Wiki

3%

Science

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "earmarked for demolition" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe a structure scheduled for destruction. According to Ludwig AI, it is suitable for general use and primarily appears in news and media contexts. While variations like "slated for demolition" exist, "earmarked for demolition" is a clear and readily understood term. Use it with concrete nouns and avoid applying it to abstract concepts for clarity. Overall, it’s a reliable phrase to use when indicating a planned demolition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

slated for demolition

Replaces "earmarked" with "slated", implying a scheduled demolition.

designated for demolition

Uses "designated" instead of "earmarked", indicating an official designation.

scheduled for demolition

Emphasizes the timing aspect with "scheduled".

marked for destruction

Replaces "demolition" with the more general "destruction".

condemned for demolition

Implies the structure is unsafe or unusable, leading to demolition.

set to be demolished

A more conversational way of saying the same thing.

planned for demolition

Highlights the planning aspect of the demolition.

earmarked for removal

Substitutes "demolition" with "removal", broadening the action beyond just destruction.

slated to be torn down

Uses a more informal expression, "torn down", instead of "demolition".

destined for demolition

Suggests that the demolition is inevitable.

FAQs

How can I use "earmarked for demolition" in a sentence?

You can use "earmarked for demolition" to indicate that a structure is scheduled to be destroyed, as in, "The old warehouse is "earmarked for demolition" to make way for a new apartment complex."

What's a more formal alternative to "earmarked for demolition"?

A more formal alternative would be "designated for demolition". For example, "The building has been "designated for demolition" by the city council."

Is it appropriate to use "earmarked for demolition" in business writing?

Yes, it's appropriate if you're discussing real estate, construction, or urban planning. For instance, "The factory site is "earmarked for demolition" as part of the redevelopment plan."

What does it mean when something is "earmarked for demolition"?

It means that a decision has been made to destroy a building or other structure. The phrase implies a plan or intention to carry out the demolition in the future. It's similar to saying something is "scheduled for demolition".