duplicative for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "duplicative for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that is redundant or repetitive in relation to a specific context or purpose. Example: "The report was deemed duplicative for the objectives we had set for this project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

UVPD, on average, produced more than 95 fragment ions per protein identification; however, a large proportion of the ion current resided in a- and x-type ions, which are sometimes duplicative for the same inter-residue position in the protein sequence.

Analytical Chemistry

Although the number of fragment ions is very high, the method could benefit from an increase in the number and abundances of complementary C-terminally derived ions, such as the radical containing z-type ions that result from ETD, as well as a decrease in ions that are duplicative for the same inter-residue position (a and a+1, for example).

Analytical Chemistry

The increase in the contribution of c- and z-type ions (which are not duplicative for the same inter-residue position) compensates for the overall lower total number of fragment ions and results in a positive impact on the E value per fragment ion.

Analytical Chemistry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Streamline coordination and oversight: We need to cut coordinating meetings and duplicative requests for information.

The New York Times

And Another private practice increased its referrals by 25percentt by using TigerText to help patients avoid duplicative tests, for example.

TechCrunch

Among the arguments--the EPA illegally issued duplicative rules for coal-fired plants and infringed on states' rights (subscription).

Huffington Post

In addition, there is no evidence for duplicative transposition of vsp genes to subtelomeric or other locations as a requirement for vsp gene expression in Giardia.

BMC Genomics

"We've built almost the same stack, which is validating for both companies, but would be duplicative of us to integrate," Kerrest said.

TechCrunch

Of these, 25 articles did not present comparative effectiveness findings for the BFC and FSC or were duplicative of ones that did, and 14 articles described observational comparative effectiveness studies of BFC and FSC; 9 for asthma and 5 for COPD.

Drugs

The ordinance passed despite strong opposition from business groups, which say it is duplicative and burdensome for businesses.

The New York Times

Developing countries' interests may not always be a top priority for duplicative, independent, vertical surveillance systems.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "duplicative for", ensure the context clearly defines what the redundancy is in relation to. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "duplicative for" in very informal settings. Simpler terms like "redundant" or "unnecessary" might be more appropriate and natural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "duplicative for" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun, followed by a preposition. This structure specifies that something is redundant or repetitive in relation to a particular purpose or context. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "duplicative for" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express that something is redundant or repetitive in relation to a specific context or purpose. While not overly common, its usage is acceptable, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. The phrase is most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, conveying a neutral to formal tone. When using "duplicative for", ensure that the context clearly specifies what the redundancy is in relation to, and consider simpler alternatives like "redundant" or "unnecessary" in more informal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

redundant for

Emphasizes that something is unnecessary because it repeats what has already been expressed.

superfluous for

Highlights that something is beyond what is required or sufficient for a purpose.

unnecessary for

Focuses on the lack of need for something in a specific context.

repetitive for

Indicates that something is repeated excessively, adding no new value.

overlapping with

Suggests that something covers the same ground as something else.

unneeded for

Similar to unnecessary, but can also imply that something was once needed but is no longer.

surplus to

Highlights that something is in excess of what is needed.

excessive for

Indicates that something goes beyond a reasonable or acceptable limit.

gratuitous for

Emphasizes that something is uncalled for or lacking good reason.

inessential for

Stresses that something is not crucial or vital in a certain situation.

FAQs

How can I use "duplicative for" in a sentence?

Use "duplicative for" to indicate that something is unnecessarily repetitive or redundant in relation to a specific purpose or context. For example, "The second report was "duplicative for" our needs".

What's a simpler way to say "duplicative for"?

Alternatives include "redundant for", "unnecessary for", or "repetitive for", which may be more suitable for less formal contexts.

When is it appropriate to use "duplicative for" instead of just "duplicative"?

Use "duplicative for" when you want to explicitly state what the subject is redundant in relation to. Just "duplicative" implies general redundancy, whereas "duplicative for" specifies a context or purpose.

Is "duplicative for" always negative, or can it be neutral?

While often used in a negative context to point out inefficiency or waste, "duplicative for" can also be neutral. For instance, in scientific analysis, noting that certain data is "duplicative for" confirming a hypothesis might simply be an observation.