due to rounding

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "due to rounding" is correct and may be used in written English.
It is generally used in order to explain why a certain calculation or figure may be slightly off or different than the actual value. For example, "The final result was 0.988, due to rounding."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Critical Care

Not all percentages add up to 100 due to rounding.

The Guardian

Note: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.

The Economist

Any discrepancies are due to rounding.

Functional Linguistics

Numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

TechCrunch

^ Exceeds 100% due to rounding.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

†Sum of percentages >100% due to rounding.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Weighted N = 1,522 due to rounding.

BMC Health Services Research

Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

BMC Gastroenterology

* Difference in Sum due to Rounding.

BMC Medical Ethics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Some percents do not sum to 100 due to rounding.

BMC Women's Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "due to rounding", clarify the level of precision used in your calculations to provide context for potential discrepancies.

Common error

Do not assume that rounding errors are always insignificant. While they may be small individually, they can accumulate and affect the validity of your results, especially in complex calculations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "due to rounding" functions as a causal explanation. It is used to explain why a sum or percentage might not equal the expected total, typically 100%. Ludwig examples confirm this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

16%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "due to rounding" is a common and grammatically sound explanation for slight discrepancies in numerical data. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent use across various fields, particularly science and news media. The phrase functions as a causal connector, justifying why totals might not add up perfectly. When using "due to rounding", consider the level of precision required for your audience and the potential impact of accumulated rounding errors. Alternatives like "owing to approximation" can provide a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

owing to approximation

Replaces the specific cause with a more generic term for approximation.

resulting from approximation

Changes the connector to indicate a result of approximation.

a consequence of approximation

Emphasizes that the discrepancy is a direct result.

as a result of rounding effects

Focuses on the 'effects' rather than the act of rounding itself.

because of approximation errors

Specifies the error as the root cause of the discrepancies.

attributable to approximation

Substitutes a more formal tone indicating that the differences can be attributed.

stemming from approximation

Emphasizes the approximation as the origin of the deviation.

discrepancies are due to approximation

Shifts the focus to the discrepancies themselves.

the difference arises from approximation

Highlights that differences stem from approximation methods.

variation caused by approximation

Implies a variability that has been caused by approximation.

FAQs

How can I use "due to rounding" in a sentence?

You can use "due to rounding" to explain slight discrepancies in calculations, such as, "The percentages do not add up to 100% "due to rounding"." It indicates that the numbers were rounded to a certain decimal place.

What's a more formal way to say "due to rounding"?

More formal alternatives include "attributable to approximation" or "the discrepancy arises from approximation". These phrases maintain a professional tone while explaining the source of the difference.

Is it always necessary to mention "due to rounding" in reports?

It's generally good practice to mention "due to rounding" when presenting numerical data that has been rounded, especially if the rounding causes totals or percentages to not align perfectly. This maintains transparency and avoids confusion.

What are some common contexts where I might use "due to rounding"?

You'll often find "due to rounding" used in scientific papers, financial reports, and statistical analyses where data is rounded for clarity or presentation purposes. It's common when presenting tables or charts with percentages.