due to random error

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "due to random error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining that a result or observation is affected by unpredictable variations or inaccuracies in measurement. Example: "The experiment's results were inconclusive, primarily due to random error in the data collection process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

Making things worse, many who are consistently top-ranked will be misclassified as such, due to random error.

The Washington Post

This is because the increased random variability makes it difficult to assess whether a small or moderate effect is due to random error or a true effect.

The Guardian

Monthly predictions of residuals had a line bias (1.5%), with a proportion of square root of mean square prediction error (RMSPE) due to random error of 97.5%.

Journal of Dairy Science

Predicted monthly herbage growth rates had a line bias of 2%, a proportion of RMSPE due to random error of 96%, and a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.87.

Journal of Dairy Science

Annual herbage production was predicted with an RMSPE of 531 (kg of herbage dry matter/ha per year), a line bias of 11%, a proportion of RMSPE due to random error of 80%, and relative prediction errors of 2%.

Journal of Dairy Science

The least significant change (LSC) was calculated as the precision × √2, which sets the minimum percentage change between successive measurements that can be considered not due to random error and therefore representing a real change in PETCO2 [28].

Annals of Intensive Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

There was a small decline in mortality and cancer-related mortality among participants who took the vitamins compared to the control groups, but researchers concluded those results could be due to random errors in the data.

Cornell University

For this reason, the Cramér-Rao bound is applied for determining the lower limit of the measurement uncertainty due to random errors.

Measurement

If the loss is assumed as due to random errors, Veno reduces the congestion window of 1/5.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Tomasetti and Vogelstein concluded that these are primarily due to random errors (mutations) in the DNA of the stem cells which damage genes that either guard against or promote cancer.

Forbes

It infers segment loss due to congestion and random error (i.e., halving Cwnd value), due to random errors (i.e., Cwnd × 4/5), or due to congestion (i.e., halving Cwnd value).

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting scientific findings, always quantify the potential impact of "due to random error" on your results by including confidence intervals or error bars.

Common error

Avoid attributing all discrepancies solely to "due to random error"; consider and address potential systematic biases or confounding variables in your analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "due to random error" functions as an adverbial phrase indicating causation. It clarifies that a particular outcome or observed variance is attributed to unpredictable and chance inaccuracies. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is indeed correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "due to random error" is a commonly used phrase to attribute outcomes to unpredictable inaccuracies, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted. The phrase helps to explain variability in results, acknowledging the role of chance. While it's most frequent in scientific publications and news media, it's crucial to consider other sources of error before attributing everything to randomness. Quantifying the impact of potential errors and being mindful of alternative explanations ensures responsible and transparent reporting of research findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

attributable to chance variation

Emphasizes the role of chance in causing the observed variation.

caused by stochastic fluctuation

Highlights the random, probabilistic nature of the cause.

resulting from unpredictable variability

Focuses on the unpredictable nature of the variability leading to the outcome.

owing to chance occurrence

Implies that the outcome happened because of a random event.

because of statistical noise

Suggests that the error is a result of random fluctuations in data.

arising from experimental imprecision

Highlights that the error originates from a lack of accuracy in the experimental setup or process.

a consequence of unsystematic mistake

Emphasizes that the outcome is a result of a non-patterned mistake.

stemming from haphazard inaccuracy

Indicates the origin of the result is an inaccuracy that lacks direction.

induced by incidental inexactness

Highlights the incidental or unintentional nature of the inexactness that caused the error.

as a result of measurement uncertainties

Focuses on uncertainties in measurement processes as the source of the error.

FAQs

How can I use "due to random error" in a sentence?

Use "due to random error" to explain that observed variations in data or results are likely caused by unpredictable, chance occurrences. For example, "The slight variations in the measurements were "due to random error" and not indicative of a real effect."

What's a more formal way to say "due to random error"?

More formal alternatives include "attributable to chance variation" or "a consequence of stochastic fluctuation". These options are suitable for academic and scientific writing, conveying the same meaning as "due to random error" with a higher degree of formality.

Is it always appropriate to attribute discrepancies to "due to random error"?

No, it's important to rule out other potential causes, such as systematic biases or confounding variables, before attributing discrepancies solely to "due to random error".

What's the difference between "due to random error" and "due to systematic error"?

"Due to random error" refers to unpredictable variations that affect measurements inconsistently, whereas "due to systematic error" indicates a consistent bias in measurements that leads to a deviation from the true value in a particular direction.