dubious veracity

USAGE SUMMARY

"dubious veracity" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that is doubtful or questionable in terms of truth or accuracy. One might use this phrase to express suspicion or doubt about a statement, claim, or piece of information. Example: The politician's statement about his involvement in the scandal was met with dubious veracity among the press and public.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Google, with its instant access to factoids of dubious veracity, is singled out as a primary source of the malaise.

The Economist

AS THIS week's deadline approached for the congressional "supercommittee" to agree on how to trim the deficit, each party tried to put pressure on the other with claims of dubious veracity.

The Economist

The Des Moines Register, for example, reported that a majority of Cain's Iowan fans are standing by their candidate, casting blame instead on the liberal media for stirring up a story of no consequence and dubious veracity, and reaffirming their faith in Cain's straight-talking ways.

The New York Times

The story follows the elder Bloom as he spins fantastical stories of dubious veracity, taking viewers on a ride through the backwoods of the American South.

Los Angeles Times

From a yarn of dubious veracity came something bigger, something indisputably real: This is how we feel about sex and race and money right now.

Vice

The medieval chronicler William of Malmesbury records that Warelwast had earlier tried to remove Osbern from office, but this story probably originates with Eadmer and is of dubious veracity.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

First, there is Morgan's writing, which combines so brilliantly an exaggerated empathy for what I'm probably not allowed to call the royals' plight with an uncanny ability to use half-truths (and even complete untruths) to achieve some (possibly dubious) higher veracity.

The Guardian - Opinion

She said she wasn't and that she's dubious about the veracity of those claims: "I don't know if it's real or not".

The New York Times

Media critic Norman Solomon noted that the first New York Times piece on Webb's series lacked "any suggestion that the CIA might be a dubious touchstone for veracity".

Huffington Post

Van Gennep further argued that Durkheim demonstrated a lack of critical stance towards his sources, collected by traders and priests, naively accepting their veracity, and that Durkheim interpreted freely from dubious data.

Wikipedia

No veracity.

The New York Times - Style

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "dubious veracity", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific claim or statement is being questioned. Providing supporting evidence or reasoning for your doubt strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "dubious veracity" as a standalone criticism. Always specify why you doubt the veracity of a statement, providing evidence or reasoning to support your claim. Without context, the phrase can sound accusatory and lack substance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dubious veracity" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase modifying a noun (often a statement, claim, or account). It serves to qualify the noun by expressing doubt or uncertainty regarding its truthfulness. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it’s a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

71%

Wiki

14%

Science

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "dubious veracity" is a grammatically sound and useful phrase for expressing doubt about the truthfulness of something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While not overly common, it appears frequently in news and media contexts. When employing this phrase, it's important to provide context and reasoning to support your skepticism. Alternative phrases like "questionable accuracy" or "doubtful truthfulness" can be used to convey similar meanings. Remember to avoid using it without sufficient context to ensure clarity and avoid sounding accusatory.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

questionable accuracy

Replaces "veracity" with "accuracy", focusing on the correctness of information.

dubious accuracy

This option replace "veracity" with a semantically similar word.

doubtful truthfulness

Substitutes "dubious" with "doubtful" and "veracity" with "truthfulness", offering a more direct synonymy.

suspect credibility

Emphasizes the reliability of the source rather than the information itself.

unreliable validity

Focuses on the dependability and factual basis of something.

tenuous truth

This option emphasizes the fragility of the truth and veracity of the statement or claim.

tenuous authenticity

Highlights the weakness or fragility of the claim's genuine nature.

debatable factualness

Suggests the information's adherence to facts is open to debate.

uncertain reliability

Emphasizes the lack of confidence in the dependability of the information.

fishy evidence

Uses a more informal term ("fishy") to describe evidence of questionable nature.

FAQs

How can I use "dubious veracity" in a sentence?

You can use "dubious veracity" to express doubt about the truthfulness of a claim. For example, "The politician's explanation for the missing funds was met with "dubious veracity" by the public".

What are some alternatives to "dubious veracity"?

Alternatives include "questionable accuracy", "doubtful truthfulness", or "suspect credibility", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "dubious veracity" a formal or informal expression?

"Dubious veracity" is generally considered a neutral to formal expression, suitable for news articles, academic papers, and professional reports. It's more formal than saying something is "fishy" or "a lie".

What's the difference between "dubious veracity" and "lack of evidence"?

"Dubious veracity" implies that there's a reason to doubt the truthfulness of a statement, even if there's some superficial evidence. "Lack of evidence", on the other hand, simply means that there is no proof to support a claim, without necessarily implying doubt about its truthfulness. It is possible that statement may be of "dubious veracity" precisely because it presents "lack of evidence".