drew parallels with

USAGE SUMMARY

"drew parallels with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use this phrase to talk about two things that are similar to one another. For example, "The author drew parallels between this century's trends and those of the 20th century."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Walsh drew parallels with other sporting greats.

The Guardian - Sport

Another deputy, Edson Moreira, drew parallels with the French Revolution.

The Guardian

Dr Williams drew parallels with scripture which he said resonated with society.

Independent

Critics in several countries drew parallels with the Charlie Hebdo attacks.

The Economist

He drew parallels with the case of Argentina, which defaulted in 2001.

The New York Times

She drew parallels with Jim Crow laws, the American apartheid that sanctioned racially segregated bathrooms.

The Guardian - Opinion

On the Sina microblog, several users drew parallels with their own situation.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

In his video, Obama draws parallels with his own upbringing.

The Guardian

Haydon said: "It does draw parallels with Paris.

The Guardian

"If you want to draw parallels with KP and Roy.

The Guardian - Sport

The play has been updated, drawing parallels with the direction that Trump's America is taking.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "drew parallels with", ensure the comparison is clear and that the shared characteristics are explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two events or situations share similarities, one caused the other. "Drawing parallels" should highlight shared traits, not imply a causal relationship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "drew parallels with" functions as a verbal phrase used to indicate that someone has made a comparison between two or more things, highlighting their similarities. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

87%

Wiki

7%

HuffPost

3%

Less common in

Science

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "drew parallels with" is a versatile and commonly used expression for comparing two distinct subjects to illuminate their similarities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it adheres to standard grammatical rules and is widely accepted in English writing. Its prevalence across various contexts, particularly in news and media, indicates its usefulness in explaining complex subjects by associating them with more familiar or easily understood concepts. While it's important to use the phrase accurately, keeping in mind the relationship isn't necessarily causal, "drew parallels with" serves as an effective means of highlighting shared traits. Alternative expressions like "compared to" or "likened to" offer similar communicative functions, adding flexibility to one's writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

compared to

Uses a different preposition to indicate comparison.

likened to

Employs a verb that means to point out or describe the similarities.

analogized to

Highlights the creation of an analogy.

made a comparison with

Nominalizes the verb, focusing on the act of comparing.

equated with

Signifies treating two things as equal or comparable.

saw similarities to

Shifts focus to the perception of similarities.

identified similarities with

Highlights the act of explicitly noting shared attributes.

found common ground with

Emphasizes shared aspects or agreements.

related to

Indicates a connection or association.

differentiated from

Implies a process of drawing connections in thought.

FAQs

How can I use "drew parallels with" in a sentence?

You can use "drew parallels with" to compare two different things that share similar characteristics. For example, "The historian "drew parallels with" the French Revolution and the Arab Spring, noting similar causes and outcomes".

What can I say instead of "drew parallels with"?

You can use alternatives like "compared to", "likened to", or "made a comparison with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "draw parallels between" instead of "drew parallels with"?

While "drew parallels with" is a valid construction, "draw parallels between" is also correct and focuses on the reciprocal relationship. For instance, "draw parallels between A and B".

What's the difference between "drew parallels with" and "related to"?

"Drew parallels with" implies a deliberate comparison to highlight similarities, whereas "related to" simply indicates a connection or association, without necessarily implying a direct comparison of similar features.